IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v30y1986i1p77-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Orientation and Conformity

Author

Listed:
  • Wim B.G. Liebrand
  • Henk A.M. Wilke
  • Rob Vogel
  • Fred J.M. Wolters

    (Department of Psychology, University of Groningen)

Abstract

Three different types of N-person social dilemma games were employed: the Prisoner's Dilemma (NPD), the Chicken Dilemma (NCD), and the Trust Dilemma (NTD). Subjects, who were classified a priori as either a cooperator (n = 58) or a defector (n = 68), participated in one of the social dilemma games before they received bogus feedback: they were told that the majority had chosen the defecting alternative D, or that the majority had chosen the cooperative alternative C. As predicted, (1) both before and after feedback, more defecting choices were made in the NPD than in the NCD, whereas in the NCD more defecting choices were made than in the NTD; (2) before and after feedback, defectors made more defecting choices than cooperators; (3) after majority D feedback more defecting choices were made than after majority C feedback. In addition, it appeared that in NPD and in NTD, defectors were especially sensitive to majority D feedback in that it facilitated their natural inclination to prefer D-choices. No support for Kelley and Stahelski's triangle hypothesis was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wim B.G. Liebrand & Henk A.M. Wilke & Rob Vogel & Fred J.M. Wolters, 1986. "Value Orientation and Conformity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(1), pages 77-97, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:30:y:1986:i:1:p:77-97
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002786030001006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002786030001006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002786030001006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:30:y:1986:i:1:p:77-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.