IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v22y1978i1p143-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Superiority of Vicarious over Direct Experience in Interpersonal Conflict Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Sanford L. Braver Van Rohrer

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

In order to compare the effects of direct versus vicarious experience in conflict resolution, an actor-subject played a Prisoner's Dilemma game, while an observer-subject observed his responses and their consequences. Each then played a subsequent, private test game against a new opponent. In all three games, the simulated opponents played a tit-for-tat strategy which reinforces cooperation and punishes competition. Thus, the proportion of cooperative responses made is a measure of how frequently the subject produced the reinforced response. Observers tend to respond more cooperatively than actors in the test game, particularly if the first game was marked by high degrees of mutual competition. The results were explained by assuming that an actor is more highly motivated than an observer and has greater difficulty acquiring a new response. A speculative attribution theoretical account was offered to explain this effect The findings demonstrate that vicarious experience (observing) is superior to direct experience (participating) for the production of appropriate responses for reduction of interpersonal conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanford L. Braver Van Rohrer, 1978. "Superiority of Vicarious over Direct Experience in Interpersonal Conflict Resolution," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 143-155, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:143-155
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277802200109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277802200109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277802200109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:143-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.