IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v21y1977i1p3-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Studies in the Balance of Power

Author

Listed:
  • Paul W. Schroeder

    (Department of History University of Illinois)

Abstract

Quantitative studies in the history of international relations have become increasingly prominent in recent years, yet have been largely ignored by diplomatic historians. The author, a diplomatic historian, examines a recent, promising effort to test balance of power theory through a quantitative analysis of the events of European diplomatic history, 1870–1881, as recorded by historians. He concludes that though the research involved is impressive and the conclusions reached both sensible and provocative, the project appears to ignore certain inherent limitations in its historical materials and certain complexities of international relations in its efforts to achieve objective ratings of cooperation vs. conflict, activity vs. passivity, and alignment vs. opposition. In addition, the objective indices for power and status seem inadequate and misleading in important respects.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul W. Schroeder, 1977. "Quantitative Studies in the Balance of Power," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(1), pages 3-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:1:p:3-22
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277702100101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277702100101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277702100101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Healy & Arthur Stein, 1973. "The Balance of Power in International History," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 17(1), pages 33-61, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ido Oren, 1994. "The Indo-Pakistani Arms Competition," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(2), pages 185-214, June.
    2. Melvin Small, 1977. "Doing Diplomatic History by the Numbers," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(1), pages 23-34, March.
    3. H. Brooke McDonald & Richard Rosecrance, 1985. "Alliance and Structural Balance in the International System," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 57-82, March.
    4. David Lai, 2001. "Alignment, Structural Balance, and International Conflict in the Middle East, 1948-1978," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(2), pages 211-249, February.
    5. Michael D. Intriligator, 1982. "Research on Conflict Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 307-327, June.
    6. Schwartz, Thomas, 2010. "The friend of my enemy is my enemy, the enemy of my enemy is my friend: Axioms for structural balance and bi-polarity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 39-45, July.
    7. Kris De Jaegher, 2021. "Common‐Enemy Effects: Multidisciplinary Antecedents And Economic Perspectives," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 3-33, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:1:p:3-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.