IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jinter/v8y1997i3p185-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Decide Environmental Policy – a Dead End?

Author

Listed:
  • Hege Westskog

    (Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM), University of Oslo, Hege Westskog, SUM, P.b.1116 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway. Tel: +4722858914, Fax: +4722858920, e-mail: hege.westskog@sum.uio.no)

Abstract

In this paper I discuss two questions which the decision maker has to consider before she makes use of the method of cost benefit analysis. First, she has to ask herself if she shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost benefit analysis. If not, could environmental cost benefit analysis be adjusted such that her ethical beliefs are incorporated? Second, if the decision maker shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost-benefit analysis, is this method appropriate when there are individuals in a society that hold other ethical beliefs than those implicitly assumed in an environmental cost-benefit analysis? When discussing these questions I focus on two different perspectives – the deontological and the agency aspect of individual preferences. I argue that the answer to both questions is «no», though the answer to the second question is not as clear as the answer to the first.

Suggested Citation

  • Hege Westskog, 1997. "The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Decide Environmental Policy – a Dead End?," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 8(3), pages 185-208, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:8:y:1997:i:3:p:185-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jie.sagepub.com/content/8/3/185.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:8:y:1997:i:3:p:185-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.