IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jfasei/v7y2025i2p148-169.html

Manufacturing and National Efficiency in BRICS+ Countries: A Fractional Meta-regression Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Mugumisi
  • Vanessa T. Tang

Abstract

This study uses fractional meta-regression analysis to investigate the heterogeneity in manufacturing and national efficiency scores in Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE and Ethiopia (BRICS)+ countries. The analysis of 281 manufacturing efficiency scores from 87 primary studies reveals an average efficiency of 65.9%, and 230 national efficiency scores from 39 studies produce an average score of 75.04%. Our findings indicate significant heterogeneity in both manufacturing and national efficiency scores, as well as the sensitivity of efficiency estimates to study-specific characteristics. Our findings reveal significant heterogeneity in efficiency scores driven by both methodological and economic factors. Methodological influences include estimation method, study orientation, sample size, number of variables, publication status and data type, reflecting differences in research design. Economically, variations arise from factors such as returns to scale and sector-specific conditions, which affect how inputs are converted into outputs. Notably, the manufacturing sector in BRICS+ countries holds substantial potential for output growth through efficiency improvements linked to better resource use, technology adoption and institutional support. JEL Classification: D2, F2

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Mugumisi & Vanessa T. Tang, 2025. "Manufacturing and National Efficiency in BRICS+ Countries: A Fractional Meta-regression Analysis," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 7(2), pages 148-169, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jfasei:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:148-169
    DOI: 10.1177/26316846251346300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26316846251346300
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/26316846251346300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmeralda Ramalho & Joaquim Ramalho & Pedro Henriques, 2010. "Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, December.
    2. Shubin Yang & Sandra Lancheros & Chris Milner, 2021. "Technological Catch-up to the National and Regional Frontier: Firm-level Evidence for India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1303-1320, August.
    3. Colin B. Begg & Jesse A. Berlin, 1988. "Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 151(3), pages 419-445, May.
    4. Ogundari, Kolawole, 2014. "The Paradigm of Agricultural Efficiency and its Implication on Food Security in Africa: What Does Meta-analysis Reveal?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 690-702.
    5. Fiona Tregenna, 2009. "Characterising deindustrialisation: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(3), pages 433-466, May.
    6. Phuc Trong Ho & Michael Burton & Chunbo Ma & Atakelty Hailu, 2022. "Quantifying heterogeneity, heteroscedasticity and publication bias effects on technical efficiency estimates of rice farming: A meta‐regression analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 580-597, June.
    7. Fall, François & Akim, Al-mouksit & Wassongma, Harouna, 2018. "DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 176-188.
    8. Dani Rodrik, 2016. "Premature deindustrialization," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    9. T. D. Stanley, 2005. "Beyond Publication Bias," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 309-345, July.
    10. repec:bla:devpol:v:27:y:2009:i:5:p:483-502 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno, 2019. "Explaining Differences In Efficiency: A Meta‐Study On Local Government Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 999-1027, July.
    12. D U A Galagedera & P Silvapulle, 2003. "Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(6), pages 654-660, June.
    13. Darold Barnum & John Gleason, 2005. "Technical efficiency bias caused by intra-input aggregation in data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(13), pages 785-788.
    14. Cai, Yuezhou, 2011. "Factors affecting the efficiency of the BRICSs' national innovation systems: A comparative study based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis," Economics Discussion Papers 2011-52, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    15. Jerzmanowski, Michal, 2007. "Total factor productivity differences: Appropriate technology vs. efficiency," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 2080-2110, November.
    16. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, March.
    17. McDonald, John, 2009. "Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 792-798, September.
    18. Mushtaq Ahmad Malik & Tariq Masood, 2021. "A decomposition analysis of total factor productivity growth in MENA countries: stochastic frontier analysis approach," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 347-366, July.
    19. Mohamed E. Chaffai, 2022. "New evidence on Islamic and conventional bank efficiency: A meta‐regression analysis," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 221-246, January.
    20. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno & Francesco Foglia, 2024. "A meta-regression analysis on judicial efficiency literature: the role of methodological and courts diversity," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2284010-228, December.
    21. T. D. Stanley, 2001. "Wheat from Chaff: Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 131-150, Summer.
    22. Jean Imbs, 2013. "The Premature Deindustrialization of South Africa," International Economic Association Series, in: Joseph E. Stiglitz & Justin Lin Yifu & Ebrahim Patel (ed.), The Industrial Policy Revolution II, chapter 6, pages 529-540, Palgrave Macmillan.
    23. Wang, Zilong & Wang, Xinbin, 2022. "Research on the impact of green finance on energy efficiency in different regions of China based on the DEA-Tobit model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justice G. Djokoto & Ferguson K. Gidiglo & Francis Y. Srofenyoh & Kofi Aaron A-O. Agyei-Henaku & Akua A. Afrane Arthur & Charlotte Badu-Prah & John Fry, 2020. "Sectoral and spatio-temporal differentiation in technical efficiency: A meta-regression," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1773659-177, January.
    2. Djokoto, Justice G. & Agyeiwaa-Afrane, Akua & Badu-Prah, Charlotte & Gidiglo, Ferguson K. & Srofenyoh, Francis Y. & Agyei-Henaku, Kofi Aaron A-O., 2025. "Application of the estimation of multiple effect size to frontier efficiency meta-regression of agriculture in Ghana," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1).
    3. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno & Francesco Foglia, 2021. "On The Heterogeneity In The Judicial Efficiency Literature: A Meta-Regression Analysis," Working Papers 202102, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    4. Rosenberger, Randall S. & Stanley, Tom D., 2006. "Measurement, generalization, and publication: Sources of error in benefit transfers and their management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 372-378, December.
    5. Veronese da Silva, Aline & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes-Ahn, Ana Lúcia, 2022. "Accounting multiple environmental variables in DEA energy transmission benchmarking modelling: The 2019 Brazilian case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Stanley, T. D. & Doucouliagos, Hristos, 2011. "Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias," Working Papers eco_2011_4, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    7. Geyer-Klingeberg, Jerome & Hang, Markus & Rathgeber, Andreas W., 2019. "What drives financial hedging? A meta-regression analysis of corporate hedging determinants," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 203-221.
    8. Tomáš Havránek, 2009. "Rose Effect and the Euro: The Magic is Gone," Working Papers IES 2009/20, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Aug 2009.
    9. Phuc Trong Ho & Michael Burton & Chunbo Ma & Atakelty Hailu, 2022. "Quantifying heterogeneity, heteroscedasticity and publication bias effects on technical efficiency estimates of rice farming: A meta‐regression analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 580-597, June.
    10. Carolyn‐Thi Thanh Dung Tran & Brian Dollery & Subba Reddy Yarram, 2023. "The Influence of Administrative Intensity on Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Australian Universities," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 42(3), pages 282-305, September.
    11. Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & da Silva, Aline Veronese & Mineti, Leandro Brioschi, 2025. "Geographical Bayesian second stage analysis for operating efficiency of Brazilian electricity distribution system operators," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Fall, François & Akim, Al-mouksit & Wassongma, Harouna, 2018. "DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 176-188.
    13. Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova, 2012. "Survey Article: Publication Bias in the Literature on Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(10), pages 1375-1396, October.
    14. Alfred Tunyire Apio & Djiby Racine Thiam & Ariel Dinar, 2025. "A Meta-Analysis of Water Institutions and Their Performance: Implications for Water Resource Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(2), pages 907-938, January.
    15. Raúl Pérez-Reyes & Beatriz Tovar, 2021. "Peruvian Electrical Distribution Firms’ Efficiency Revisited: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno, 2019. "Explaining Differences In Efficiency: A Meta‐Study On Local Government Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 999-1027, July.
    17. Víctor Chang & Beatriz Tovar, 2022. "Efficiency drivers for the South Pacific West coast port terminals: a two-stage non-convex metafrontier dea approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2667-2701, July.
    18. Hristos Doucouliagos & Patrice Laroche & Douglas L. Kruse & T. D. Stanley, 2020. "Is Profit Sharing Productive? A Meta‐Regression Analysis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 364-395, June.
    19. Alexandra Ferreira‐Lopes & Pedro Linhares & Luís Filipe Martins & Tiago Neves Sequeira, 2022. "Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 235-268, February.
    20. Chatzistamoulou, Nikos & Kounetas, Kostas & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2024. "Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jfasei:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:148-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.