IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v50y2025i5p896-923.html

Assessing Item Fit Using Expected Score Curve Under Restricted Recalibration

Author

Listed:
  • Youngjin Han
  • Ji Seung Yang
  • Yang Liu

Abstract

In item response theory applications, item fit analysis is often performed for precalibrated items using response data from subsequent test administrations. Because such practices lead to the involvement of sampling variability from two distinct samples that must be properly addressed for statistical inferences, conventional item fit analysis can be revisited and modified. This study extends the item fit analysis originally proposed by Haberman et al., which involves examining the discrepancy between the model-implied and empirical expected score curve. We analytically derive the standard errors that accurately account for the sampling variability from two samples within the framework of restricted recalibration. After derivation, we present the findings from a simulation study that evaluates the performance of our proposed method in terms of the empirical Type I error rate and power, for both dichotomous and polytomous items. An empirical example is also provided, in which we assess the item fit of pediatric short-form scale in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngjin Han & Ji Seung Yang & Yang Liu, 2025. "Assessing Item Fit Using Expected Score Curve Under Restricted Recalibration," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(5), pages 896-923, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:50:y:2025:i:5:p:896-923
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986241268604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986241268604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986241268604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelby Haberman & Sandip Sinharay & Kyong Chon, 2013. "Assessing Item Fit for Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models Using Residuals from Estimated Item Response Functions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 417-440, July.
    2. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    3. Robert Gibbons & Donald Hedeker, 1992. "Full-information item bi-factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 423-436, September.
    4. R. Darrell Bock, 1972. "Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 29-51, March.
    5. Yang Liu & Ji Seung Yang & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2019. "Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 529-553, June.
    6. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    7. Scott Monroe, 2021. "Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in IRT Using Posterior Residuals," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 374-398, June.
    8. Scott Monroe, 2019. "Estimation of Expected Fisher Information for IRT Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(4), pages 431-447, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter W. Rijn & Usama S. Ali & Hyo Jeong Shin & Sean-Hwane Joo, 2024. "Adjusted Residuals for Evaluating Conditional Independence in IRT Models for Multistage Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 317-346, March.
    2. Scott Monroe, 2021. "Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in IRT Using Posterior Residuals," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 374-398, June.
    3. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2025. "Item response theory—a statistical framework for educational and psychological measurement," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Björn Andersson & Tao Xin, 2021. "Estimation of Latent Regression Item Response Theory Models Using a Second-Order Laplace Approximation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 244-265, April.
    5. Jochen Ranger & Kay Brauer, 2022. "On the Generalized S − X 2 –Test of Item Fit: Some Variants, Residuals, and a Graphical Visualization," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(2), pages 202-230, April.
    6. Yang Liu & Jan Hannig, 2017. "Generalized Fiducial Inference for Logistic Graded Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1097-1125, December.
    7. Paul A. Jewsbury & Peter W. van Rijn, 2020. "IRT and MIRT Models for Item Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Multistage Tests," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(4), pages 383-402, August.
    8. James O. Ramsay & Juan Li & Charles N. Bernstein & Ruth Ann Marrie & Joakim Wallmark & Marie Wiberg, 2026. "Using the Information Metric to Analyze Clinical Rating Scales," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 51(2), pages 395-418, April.
    9. Xue Wang & Jing Lu & Jiwei Zhang, 2025. "A Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro algorithm via variational inference for estimating the multidimensional graded response model: a calculationally efficient estimation scheme to deal with complex test structures," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1253-1284, March.
    10. Andersson, Björn & Jin, Shaobo & Zhang, Maoxin, 2023. "Fast estimation of multiple group generalized linear latent variable models for categorical observed variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Nana Kim & Daniel M. Bolt & James Wollack, 2022. "Noncompensatory MIRT For Passage-Based Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 992-1009, September.
    12. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab, Center for Open Science.
    13. Klint Kanopka & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2025. "A Position-Sensitive Mixture Item Response Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(6), pages 1026-1059, December.
    14. Melissa Gladstone & Gillian Lancaster & Gareth McCray & Vanessa Cavallera & Claudia R. L. Alves & Limbika Maliwichi & Muneera A. Rasheed & Tarun Dua & Magdalena Janus & Patricia Kariger, 2021. "Validation of the Infant and Young Child Development (IYCD) Indicators in Three Countries: Brazil, Malawi and Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Qiao, Jiawei & Chen, Yunxiao & Ying, Zhiliang, 2025. "Exact exploratory bi-factor analysis: a constraint-based optimization approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127955, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Victoria T. Tanaka & George Engelhard & Matthew P. Rabbitt, 2020. "Using a Bifactor Model to Measure Food Insecurity in Households with Children," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 492-504, September.
    17. Jean-Paul Fox & Cees Glas, 2001. "Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using gibbs sampling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 271-288, June.
    18. C. Glas & Anna Dagohoy, 2007. "A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 159-180, June.
    19. Michael Edwards, 2010. "A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 474-497, September.
    20. Yoav Bergner & Peter Halpin & Jill-Jênn Vie, 2022. "Multidimensional Item Response Theory in the Style of Collaborative Filtering," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 266-288, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:50:y:2025:i:5:p:896-923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.