IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v50y2025i4p682-713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iterative Attribute Hierarchy Exploration Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models

Author

Listed:
  • Xueqin Zhang

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Yu Jiang

    (National Defense University of PLA China)

  • Tao Xin

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Yanlou Liu

    (Qufu Normal University)

Abstract

Attribute hierarchies are commonly assumed to exist in many fields of psychological and educational assessment. Several theory-driven and data-driven approaches have been used to validate or explore attribute hierarchies, such as validating attribute hierarchies in the cognitive diagnostic model (CDM) through statistical hypothesis testing or even learning attribute hierarchies directly from data. A class of structural parameter standard error estimation methods for CDMs is useful for exploring attribute hierarchies, with the limitation that the information matrices of some model parameters may be unstable or singular, leading to biased hypothesis testing. An iterative method of attribute hierarchy testing was proposed to modify the original z -statistic method. The simulation study systematically compares the performance of the z -statistic and the iterative z -statistic in exploring the attribute hierarchy. The results show that the iterative z -statistic provides a better Type I error control rate and statistical power, and it partially solves the problem that the z -statistic is too conservative. In addition, the iterative z -statistic method also achieves satisfactory results on real data.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueqin Zhang & Yu Jiang & Tao Xin & Yanlou Liu, 2025. "Iterative Attribute Hierarchy Exploration Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(4), pages 682-713, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:682-713
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986241268906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986241268906
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986241268906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:682-713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.