IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v35y2010i5p566-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Robustness of Designs for Trials With Nested Data Against Incorrect Initial Intracluster Correlation Coefficient Estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Elly J. H. Korendijk

    (Utrecht University)

  • Mirjam Moerbeek

    (Utrecht University)

  • Cora J. M. Maas

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

In the case of trials with nested data, the optimal allocation of units depends on the budget, the costs, and the intracluster correlation coefficient. In general, the intracluster correlation coefficient is unknown in advance and an initial guess has to be made based on published values or subject matter knowledge. This initial estimate is likely to deviate from the true intracluster correlation coefficient. The current study investigates the extent to which the efficiency of a design for a trial with nested data and continuous outcome variables is influenced by an incorrect initial intracluster correlation coefficient estimate. We focus on trials with nested data in both treatment conditions as well as in one treatment condition. The investigated designs prove to be rather robust against the misspecification of the intracluster correlation coefficient. Although underestimating the intracluster correlation coefficient leads to a steeper decrease in the efficiency of a design than overestimating it, the relative efficiency of the treatment effect estimate remains above 90% as long as the population intracluster correlation coefficient is not underestimated by more than 75% or overestimated by more than 175%.

Suggested Citation

  • Elly J. H. Korendijk & Mirjam Moerbeek & Cora J. M. Maas, 2010. "The Robustness of Designs for Trials With Nested Data Against Incorrect Initial Intracluster Correlation Coefficient Estimates," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(5), pages 566-585, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:35:y:2010:i:5:p:566-585
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998609360774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998609360774
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998609360774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:35:y:2010:i:5:p:566-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.