IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v33y2008i1p88-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The D-Optimality Item Selection Criterion in the Early Stage of CAT: A Study With the Graded Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Lima Passos
  • Martijn P. F. Berger
  • Frans E. S. Tan

Abstract

During the early stage of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), item selection criteria based on Fisher’s information often produce less stable latent trait estimates than the Kullback-Leibler global information criterion. Robustness against early stage instability has been reported for the D-optimality criterion in a polytomous CAT with the Nominal Response Model and is shown herein to be reproducible for the Graded Response Model. For comparative purposes, the A-optimality and the global information criteria are also applied. Their item selection is investigated as a function of test progression and item bank composition. The results indicate how the selection of specific item parameters underlies the criteria performances evaluated via accuracy and precision of estimation. In addition, the criteria item exposure rates are compared, without the use of any exposure controlling measure. On the account of stability, precision, accuracy, numerical simplicity, and less evidently, item exposure rate, the D-optimality criterion can be recommended for CAT.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Lima Passos & Martijn P. F. Berger & Frans E. S. Tan, 2008. "The D-Optimality Item Selection Criterion in the Early Stage of CAT: A Study With the Graded Response Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 33(1), pages 88-110, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:1:p:88-110
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998607302631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998607302631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998607302631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:33:y:2008:i:1:p:88-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.