IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v26y2001i1p73-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting Nonlinear Associations, Plus Comments on Testing Hypotheses About the Correlation Coefficient

Author

Listed:
  • Rand R. Wilcox

Abstract

Let (Y i , X i ), i = 1, . . . , n, be a random sample from some p + 1 variate distribution where X i is a vector of length p. In the social sciences, the most common strategy for detecting an association between Y and the marginal distributions is to test the hypothesis that the corresponding correlations are zero using a standard Student’s t test. There are two practical problems with this strategy. First, for reasons described in the article, there are situations where the correlation between two random variables is zero, but Student’s t test is not even asymptotically correct. In fact, the probability of rejecting can approach one as the sample size gets large, even though the hypothesis of a zero correlation is true. Of course, one can also apply standard methods based on a linear regression model and the least squares estimator, but the same practical problems arise. Second, Student’s t test can miss nonlinear associations. This latter problem is the main motivation for this article. Results of a former study suggest an approach that avoids both of the difficulties just described. Based on simulations, it is found that the Cramér-von Mises form of the test statistic is generally better than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov form. Situations arise where this method has less power than Student’s t test, but this is due in part to t test’s use of an incorrect estimate of the standard error.

Suggested Citation

  • Rand R. Wilcox, 2001. "Detecting Nonlinear Associations, Plus Comments on Testing Hypotheses About the Correlation Coefficient," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 26(1), pages 73-83, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:26:y:2001:i:1:p:73-83
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986026001073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986026001073
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986026001073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:26:y:2001:i:1:p:73-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.