IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v22y1997i4p425-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating Multiple Imputations for Matrix Sampling Data Analyzed With Item Response Models

Author

Listed:
  • Neal Thomas
  • Nianci Gan

Abstract

Sample survey designs in which each participant is administered a subset of the items contained in a complete survey instrument are becoming an increasingly popular method of reducing respondent burden ( Mislevy, Beaton, Kaplan, Sheehan 1992 ; Raghunathan & Grizzle, 1995 ; Wacholder, Carroll, Pee, Gail 1994 ). Data from these survey designs can be analyzed using multiple imputation methodology that generates several imputed values for the missing data and thus yields several complete data sets. These data sets are then analyzed using complete data estimators and their standard errors ( Rubin, 1987b ). Generating the imputed data sets, however, can be very difficult. We describe improvements to the methods currently used to generate the imputed data sets for item response models summarizing educational data collected by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), an ongoing collection of samples of 4th, 8th, and 12th grade students in the United States. The improved approximations produce small to moderate changes in commonly reported estimates, with the larger changes associated with an increasing amount of missing data. The improved approximations produce larger standard errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal Thomas & Nianci Gan, 1997. "Generating Multiple Imputations for Matrix Sampling Data Analyzed With Item Response Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 22(4), pages 425-445, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:22:y:1997:i:4:p:425-445
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986022004425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986022004425
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986022004425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:22:y:1997:i:4:p:425-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.