IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v21y1996i3p203-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciling Experts’ Differences in Setting Cut Scores for Pass-Fail Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas T. Longford

Abstract

Standard setting is a routine procedure in educational testing. Each examinee in the administration of a test is assigned a score, and the responses of a sample of the examinees are reviewed by a panel of experts. Each expert rates every selected examinee as pass or fail. Based on these ratings a cut score is to be established. A random effects logistic regression method is applied to set the cut score and to estimate the associated standard error. Two examples illustrate that taking account of between-rater differences is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas T. Longford, 1996. "Reconciling Experts’ Differences in Setting Cut Scores for Pass-Fail Decisions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 21(3), pages 203-213, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:3:p:203-213
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986021003203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986021003203
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986021003203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:3:p:203-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.