IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v21y1996i3p187-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Magnitude of Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Zwick
  • Dorothy T. Thayer

Abstract

Several recent studies have investigated the application of statistical inference procedures to the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomous test items that are scored on an ordinal scale. Mantel’s extension of the Mantel-Haenszel test is one of several hypothesis-testing methods for this purpose. The development of descriptive statistics for characterizing DIF in polytomous test items has received less attention. As a step in this direction, two possible standard error formulas for the polytomous DIF index proposed by Dorans and Schmitt were derived. These standard errors, as well as associated hypothesis-testing procedures, were evaluated though application to simulated data. The standard error that performed better is based on Mantel’s hypergeometric model. The alternative standard error, based on a multinomial model, tended to yield values that were too small.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Zwick & Dorothy T. Thayer, 1996. "Evaluating the Magnitude of Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 21(3), pages 187-201, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:3:p:187-201
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986021003187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986021003187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986021003187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:21:y:1996:i:3:p:187-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.