IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v18y1993i1p1-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis of Two-Factor Interactions in Fixed Effects Linear Models

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Boik

Abstract

This article considers two related issues concerning the analysis of interactions in complex linear models. The first issue concerns the omnibus test for interaction. Apparently, it is not well known that the usual F test for interaction can be replaced, in many applications, by a test that is more powerful against a certain class of alternatives. The competing test is based on the maximal product interaction contrast F statistic and achieves its power advantage by focusing solely on product contrasts. The maximal product interaction F test is reviewed and three new results are reported: (a) An extended table of exact critical values is computed, (b) a table of moment functions useful for approximating the p-value corresponding to an observed maximal F statistic is computed, and (c) a simulation study concerning the null distribution of the maximal F statistic when data are unbalanced or covariates are present is reported. It is conjectured that lack of balance or presence of covariates has no effect on the null distribution. The simulation results support the conjecture. The second issue concerns follow-up tests when the omnibus test is significant. It appears that researchers, in general, do not perform coherent follow-up tests on interactions. To make it easier for researchers to do so, an exposition on the use of product interaction contrasts and partial interactions in complex fixed-effects models is provided. The recommended omnibus and follow-up tests are illustrated on an educational data set analyzed using SAS ( SAS Institute, 1988 ) and SPSS (1990) .

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Boik, 1993. "The Analysis of Two-Factor Interactions in Fixed Effects Linear Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 18(1), pages 1-40, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:18:y:1993:i:1:p:1-40
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986018001001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986018001001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986018001001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:18:y:1993:i:1:p:1-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.