IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v13y1988i2p148-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Change in Dispersion

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen W. Raudenbush

Abstract

Statistical methods are presented for studying changes in the dispersion of a dependent measure over time, for estimating the effects of treatments on the rate of dispersion change, and for combining such estimated effects from a series of related studies. Available methods for comparing both uncorrected and correlated dispersion estimates are first reviewed, including exact likelihood methods, approximate likelihood methods based on log transformed variances, and robust methods. Use of the log transformation provides reasonably efficient estimation, extends simply to the case of correlated dispersion estimates, and yields scale invariant estimates of dispersion change. However, because standard error estimates are not robust to violations of the normality assumption, a non-normality parameter is introduced which facilitates sensitivity analysis. Relative efficiency is evaluated for estimates of dispersion change based on posttest-only comparisons, “pre-post†change comparisons, and comparisons of residual variances after covariance adjustments. These ideas are illustrated by a reanalysis of data from two experiments assessing the effect of teacher expectancy on pupil IQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen W. Raudenbush, 1988. "Estimating Change in Dispersion," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 13(2), pages 148-171, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:13:y:1988:i:2:p:148-171
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986013002148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986013002148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986013002148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Markus Hang & Andreas W. Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl & Matthias Walter, 2018. "What do we really know about corporate hedging? A meta-analytical study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:13:y:1988:i:2:p:148-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.