Author
Abstract
Dwelling on the cultural power of Indian philosophy, theory and knowledge-practices, the present article attempts to explore the plausibility of an Indian discourse on the planetary. The global climate crisis has driven the economic and military powers of the world to reluctantly realize that the global warming-induced crisis poses serious threats for one and all. The project of deep industrialization and its techno-scientific remedies clearly have failed to tackle the life-threatening industrial pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, which have brought the planet to the doorstep of ecological disequilibrium. Writing in 1989, Felix Guattari had feared that ‘after a century of unparalleled scientific and technological progress, we have made our presence known to the planet in the most dramatic and self-defeating fashion’. Today, the post-Western hegemonic world is perhaps most evident in the pluriversal assertion of knowledge-cultures that (a) challenge the universalism of Western modernity and its anthropocentric worldview, and (b) emphasize the need for multiple knowledge epistemologies in our planetary existence. From classical Indian thought to contemporary postcolonial theoretical interventions for cultural pluralism, to that of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) based lived practices in India’s ‘scheduled’ regions, these constitute the distinctive Indian knowledge traditions that can, as this article argues, help India come up with an Indian discourse on the planetary. For, in addressing the inherent weaknesses of an anthropogenic and universal knowledge subjectivity of Western modernity, multiple knowledge epistemologies indeed seem to have become inevitable in the intellectual field of a post-Western hegemonic climatic time.
Suggested Citation
Mollica Dastider, 2024.
"Exploring an Indian Discourse on the Planetary: Climate Crisis and the Imperative of Traditional Ecological Knowledge,"
International Studies, , vol. 61(4), pages 432-445, October.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:intstu:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:432-445
DOI: 10.1177/00208817251371906
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:432-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.