IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v44y2007i4p317-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asia in the Debate on Russian Identity

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Kumar Pandey

    (Sanjay Kumar Pandey is Associate Professor, Centre for Russian & Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. E-mail: skpandey@mail.jnu.ac.in)

Abstract

The issue of Russian identity—whether Russia belongs to Europe or Asia or is unique and distinct—has been debated for nearly three centuries within and outside Russia. Though Russia's relation with Europe was central to the debate, Asia also figured prominently in it. The article tries to examine Asia's role in the shaping of Russian identity. The issue has acquired further importance in the recent years as post-Soviet Russia is faced with the task of defining its place in the present day world.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Kumar Pandey, 2007. "Asia in the Debate on Russian Identity," International Studies, , vol. 44(4), pages 317-337, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:44:y:2007:i:4:p:317-337
    DOI: 10.1177/002088170704400403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002088170704400403
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002088170704400403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kerr, 1995. "The new Eurasianism: The rise of geopolitics in Russia's foreign policy," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 977-988.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serafettin Yilmaz & Liu Changming, 2018. "China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Strategy in Eurasia and Euro-Atlanticism," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 252-276, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:44:y:2007:i:4:p:317-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.