IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v5y2009i1p20-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust Architecture in Dynamic Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Guo Yajun
  • Yu Zhongqiang
  • Chen Hao
  • Dong Huihui

Abstract

Trust is the key for an information system to make security decisions. There does not exist in an aforehand trust relationship among principals in dynamic systems. To secure transaction, trust relationship must be established in principals. However, the existing trust architectures are flat, so they cannot embody well the dynamic characteristic of trust and do not take on well operability. In this paper, a two-layer trust architecture for dynamic systems is presented. Trust in this model is composed of a basic trust layer and a dynamic trust layer. Basic trust depends on the attributes of a principal, recommendation, or experience, while dynamic trust relies on the application context. This trust structure can reduce the complexity of making a decision in dynamic system. In dynamic systems, there are many factors to form trust, such as principal experience, attribute, recommendation, and context. In these trust factors, the context trust factor is different from the others, which it changes when close with the current context. We classify these trust factors into two groups. The first group includes experience, attribute, and recommendation to form this basic trust, while the second group involves current context to form dynamic trust. The trust value in this two-layer trust architecture was expressed as T = (T a , T c ). Where T a is the combination trust value of the attribute trust, experience, and recommendation trust, and T c is the context trust value. Obviously, the relationship among trust values is a partial ordering. Experience usually associates with events. Positive trust events can increase the experience value, and negative trust events will reduce the experience. Because the importance of events is different, each event is assigned a weight. The larger the weight is, the more important the event is. Experience evaluation strategy provides the evaluation method for the occurred event. The attribute trust is the evaluation of the credibility, reliability, and security ability of the trusted principal according to the attributes of the trusted principal. The context trust is the trust evaluation of principals in a special context. Trust strategy is different in the different application context. For example, the trust strategy of a printer may be “medium†when the printer is free and the principal is in the offices, and may be “low†when the principal is not in the office, or when the printer is busy. The context trust value is the function of the context information: T c = h(C), C is the context information.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo Yajun & Yu Zhongqiang & Chen Hao & Dong Huihui, 2009. "Trust Architecture in Dynamic Systems," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 5(1), pages 20-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:5:y:2009:i:1:p:20-20
    DOI: 10.1080/15501320802508378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/15501320802508378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15501320802508378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:5:y:2009:i:1:p:20-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.