IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v72y2016i3p268-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ayub Khan’s Basic Democracy and Political Continuity in Contemporary Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Kunal Mukherjee

Abstract

The paper looks at the concept of political ‘hybridity’ within the broader framework of Pakistan’s domestic politics. Whilst analysing Pakistan’s domestic politics, most analysts tend to view the country’s political system as authoritarian and label it as a military dictatorship. Whilst this has been true for most of Pakistan’s history since it came into existence in 1947, it is also equally important to look at the role played by the more democratic elements of Pakistani society in politics, and the interactions that have taken place between the more democratic forces on the one hand, and the more authoritarian elements on the other. This paper moves away from traditional ways of viewing Pakistan’s domestic politics and focuses more on the grey areas, instead of viewing the country in black or white terms. In doing so, the paper has a strong focus on Ayub Khan’s concept of Basic Democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunal Mukherjee, 2016. "Ayub Khan’s Basic Democracy and Political Continuity in Contemporary Pakistan," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 72(3), pages 268-277, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:72:y:2016:i:3:p:268-277
    DOI: 10.1177/0974928416656498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0974928416656498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0974928416656498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:72:y:2016:i:3:p:268-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.