IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indpol/v2y2014i2p215-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affirmative Action for Muslims? Arguments, Contentions and Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd. Sanjeer Alam

    (Mohd. Sanjeer Alam, Assistant Professor at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), Delhi. E-mail:sanjeer.alam@gmail.com)

Abstract

India is one of the most unequal societies of the world. At the same time, it has the distinction of having the longest history of affirmative action programmes for alleviating socio-economic inequalities. Currently, three social groups—the Scheduled Castes (SCs), the Scheduled Tribes (STs) and the Other Backward Classes (OBCs)—enjoy the benefits of affirmative action programmes, of reservation in particular. However, the demands to get acknowledged as ‘disadvantaged’ and for inclusion in the system of affirmative action have not stopped. Of late, the demands for reservation for disadvantaged minorities, Muslims in particular, have ignited intense and polarized debates. All this has not only complicated the politics of ‘recognition’ and ‘redistribution’ but also affected the discourse on and capacity of existing affirmative measures to tackle the issue of group-based disadvantages. Against this backdrop, the objective of this article is two-fold: (a) to get into the complexities underlying the idea of affirmative action for Muslims; and (b) to move the debates on affirmative action beyond ‘one policy fits all’ perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd. Sanjeer Alam, 2014. "Affirmative Action for Muslims? Arguments, Contentions and Alternatives," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 2(2), pages 215-229, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:215-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://inp.sagepub.com/content/2/2/215.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:215-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.