IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indpol/v14y2026i1p8-19.html

Buddha ‘or’/‘and’ Karl Marx Controversy: Ambedkar, Texts and Clarifications

Author

Listed:
  • Rushabh Dhongde

Abstract

Ambedkar has been a desired figure in Indian space with figurations that are varied. In spite of his overwhelming recognition, there have been many misunderstandings about him. One such misunderstanding is about the question of Marxism and Buddhism in his writings. Importantly, this aspect has been found predominantly on the reading and reception of Ambedkar’s text, supposedly titled Buddha or Karl Marx . The misunderstanding has incubated an ‘or’/‘and’ controversy, the ‘or’ Ambedkarites pitted against the ‘and’ Ambedkarites. This article first traces a possible origin of the ‘or’/‘and’ controversy. It then clarifies the naming of the titles of the text and argues that there are four texts (and not one) in Ambedkar’s writings on the question. The article also clarifies that the case is not about the binary positions (as has been portrayed). Instead, Ambedkar retains both ‘or’ and ‘and’, in which spiritual elements of Buddhism suture with the secular aims of Marxism.

Suggested Citation

  • Rushabh Dhongde, 2026. "Buddha ‘or’/‘and’ Karl Marx Controversy: Ambedkar, Texts and Clarifications," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 14(1), pages 8-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:14:y:2026:i:1:p:8-19
    DOI: 10.1177/23210230261429194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23210230261429194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23210230261429194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:14:y:2026:i:1:p:8-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.