IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indpol/v11y2023i2p274-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Ideology in Indian Politics: Why Do Elite and Mass Politics Differ?

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Verma
  • Pradeep K. Chhibber

Abstract

A long line of scholarship has argued that ideological division structures party politics in many parts of the world. In India, however, there is a long-held consensus that the parties do not sort themselves ideologically, especially regarding economic policymaking. The paper analyses National Election Studies data between 1996 and 2019 by Lokniti-CSDS, and shows that voters cluster around the centre-left position on economic issues. Nevertheless, there are discernible ideological differences among the party members. The Bhartiya Janata Party members are more likely to favour privatisation, and members of Left parties prefer labour rights. These ideological differences are also evident in our analysis of the manifestos of political parties since 1952 and an expert survey conducted in 2022. We argue that these elite differences in economic policy do not translate into mass politics because all political parties present the State as the solution to economic deprivation. The rise of welfare populism in Indian politics in the past two decades, we suggest, is a result of centralisation within political parties in which the welfare promises are directly linked to the party leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Verma & Pradeep K. Chhibber, 2023. "Economic Ideology in Indian Politics: Why Do Elite and Mass Politics Differ?," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 11(2), pages 274-288, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:274-288
    DOI: 10.1177/23210230231209450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23210230231209450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23210230231209450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:274-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.