IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indgen/v26y2019i1-2p59-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imperfect Information in Menstrual Health and the Role of Informed Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Tanya Mahajan

Abstract

This article explores how imperfect information and the culture of silence around menstruation have shaped the menstrual hygiene product market. It is generally considered that the use of sanitary napkins is equivalent to hygiene. This view is critically evaluated in light of evidence. In a highly competitive market, materials used in sanitary napkin products have evolved significantly. Policymakers and regulators need to be informed about the nature of products entering the Indian market and their implications on women’s health and cost to the environment. The menstrual hygiene market now offers some less-known innovations such as menstrual cups, reusable cloth pads and compostable sanitary napkins that could offer a more sustainable direction to the industry. However, they also have their own barriers to access and use. Given the increasing choice available in the market and potential for accessing information, it has become pertinent that relevant stakeholders—such as women, government officials and the media—are made aware of the basket of options for menstrual hygiene management. Field experiments done to this end indicate that informed choice will automatically ensure that cost to women’s health and the environment is minimised.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanya Mahajan, 2019. "Imperfect Information in Menstrual Health and the Role of Informed Choice," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 26(1-2), pages 59-78, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:26:y:2019:i:1-2:p:59-78
    DOI: 10.1177/0971521518811169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521518811169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971521518811169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2022. "Information, Choice and Menstrual Outcomes: Evidence from a CommunityBased Intervention in Indi," Working Papers 202211, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    2. Supriya Garikipati, 2020. "Asymmetric Information in Menstrual Health and Implications for Sustainability: Insights from India," Working Papers 202015, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    3. Laura Medina-Perucha & Tomàs López-Jiménez & Anna Sofie Holst & Constanza Jacques-Aviñó & Jordina Munrós-Feliu & Cristina Martínez-Bueno & Carme Valls-Llobet & Diana Pinzón Sanabria & Mª Mercedes Vice, 2022. "Use and perceptions on reusable and non-reusable menstrual products in Spain: A mixed-methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Laura Rossouw & Hana Ross, 2021. "Understanding Period Poverty: Socio-Economic Inequalities in Menstrual Hygiene Management in Eight Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2021. "What’s the Bleeding Problem? Period Poverty, Information Failure and Consumer Preferences in the Global South," Working Papers 202107, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    6. Punita Bhatt & Supriya Garikipati, 2021. "Culture, Collectivism and Empowerment: The Role of Feminist Ideologies in Women’s Work and Organization," Working Papers 202108, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    7. Annie D. Smith & Alfred Muli & Kellogg J. Schwab & Julie Hennegan, 2020. "National Monitoring for Menstrual Health and Hygiene: Is the Type of Menstrual Material Used Indicative of Needs Across 10 Countries?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:26:y:2019:i:1-2:p:59-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.