IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indgen/v23y2016i2p243-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation and Third Way Theories: The Beleaguered Family and the Marginalisation of Women

Author

Listed:
  • Taisha Abraham

Abstract

The neoliberal logic of globalisation that shapes today’s world imposes certain roles on the family and the community as important social units for the regeneration of civil society, best done through the reform discourse of Third Way theories. Third Way thinking resurfaced in the vacuum created by the collapse of the Soviet bloc, the retreat of socialism and the inadequacy of unfettered neoliberalism as an effective alternative. The Third Way move to create a public space through the family and the community, separate from state structures and marketplace compulsions, to foster ‘dialogic democracy’ and civil morality poses several problems for women. The first relates to the renewal of family and community, both ‘essentially contested concepts’, without addressing the inequities embedded in these units. The second concerns the onus of renewing and regulating democracy by shifting from the state to civil society, whereby individuals gain agency and class/caste/gender/race and other structural differences are erased. Globalisation intersects in ambivalent ways with already existing caste/class/gender/race relations, rendering complex the notion of using these social units as tools for civil regeneration. Third Way theories do not necessarily re-invent the family and the community as social units; they merely re-orient them to the demands of neoliberalism. These theories must locate the family and the community within the global context of the restructuring of capital itself and perceive capitalism as setting limits on the extent to which both these units can be reformed or regulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Taisha Abraham, 2016. "Globalisation and Third Way Theories: The Beleaguered Family and the Marginalisation of Women," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 23(2), pages 243-259, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:243-259
    DOI: 10.1177/0971521516635331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521516635331
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971521516635331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:243-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.