IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v53y2016i3p343-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Plants out of place’: The ‘noxious weeds’ eradication campaign in colonial south India

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Nongbri

    (Janki Devi Memorial College, Delhi University)

Abstract

The spread of transferred plants such as the prickly pear and lantana, labelled ‘noxious weeds’ in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century south India, and the exploration of viable means for their extirpation gave rise to a complex colonial discourse. Such plants not only seriously impeded agricultural and plantation interests but also threatened colonial commercial concerns. The eradication discourse consisted of various shades of opinion highlighting the ambivalences and contradictions within the eradication agenda. The increasing use of the legal domain as a regime of control by the colonial state was directed at legitimising the use of coercion for the destruction of undesirable plants. Notably, the use of legal coercion proved ineffective in the face of escalating costs of implementation and lack of local support. Local voices appealing against the enactment of eradication programmes were also attempts at opposing the colonial state’s efforts at instituting a regime of control. The colonial state’s eradication discourse and campaign against lantana in south India provide valuable insights into the then prevailing perceptions and attitudes towards exotics and invasives.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Nongbri, 2016. "‘Plants out of place’: The ‘noxious weeds’ eradication campaign in colonial south India," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 53(3), pages 343-369, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:53:y:2016:i:3:p:343-369
    DOI: 10.1177/0019464616651163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019464616651163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019464616651163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:53:y:2016:i:3:p:343-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.