IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ieshis/v52y2025i1p41-71.html

The Famine That Wasn't? Ireland, 1799–1801

Author

Listed:
  • Liam Kennedy

    (School of History, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK)

  • Peter M. Solar

    (CEREC, UCLouvain Saint-Louis, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper re-examines the period of potential famine in Ireland between 1799 and 1801, reframing it as the ‘Famine that Wasn't’ Although successive harvest failures occurred during these years-back-to-back crop failures in 1799 and 1800-famine conditions did not follow. The study critically investigates how Ireland avoided mass starvation despite these climatic and agricultural challenges in a period better known for constitutional change, notably the Act of Union between Britain and Ireland which came into effect in January 1801. The broad conclusion reached is that while immediate food shortages and social distress were evident, famine was averted in 1800 and 1801 due to a combination of favourable political, ideological and social circumstances, timely state interventions, flexible relations of production, some scattered instances of organised philanthropy, and a widespread ethic of sharing. Acting in conjunction, these served to limit excess mortality. The Irish would not be so fortunate a half century later. Of theoretical interest to economists and economic anthropologists, the paper argues that in pre-industrial economies spikes in food prices may be poor indicators of the extent of distress and excess mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Liam Kennedy & Peter M. Solar, 2025. "The Famine That Wasn't? Ireland, 1799–1801," Irish Economic and Social History, , vol. 52(1), pages 41-71, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ieshis:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:41-71
    DOI: 10.1177/03324893251352372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03324893251352372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03324893251352372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ieshis:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:41-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.