IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v27y2026i4p723-731.html

Credit Suisse–Greensill Saga: A Case of Risk Management Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Arijit Bhattacharya
  • R. R. Reddy

Abstract

This article has focused on Greensill, the financial technology start-up, till its untimely closure in March 2021. Greensill’s original business model was built on providing traditional supply chain finance to business, but additionally, it packaged and sold these loans as ‘safe’ investments to various institutional investors through Credit Suisse, the 165-year-old Switzerland-based private bank. In order to grow at an exponential rate to support its high valuation, Greensill adopted various high-risk, questionable business practices. But its principal partner during this journey, the veteran bank officials of Credit Suisse, was either blissfully unaware of the wrongdoings or chose to ignore it. As Greensill collapsed, the bank paid a high price for this oversight in terms of monetary and reputational damage. The case has chronicled how the bank’s top officials in order to pursue the bank’s ‘integrated bank platform strategy’ chased short-term profit and turned a blind eye to all rules of due diligence and risk management. Though the bank made superficial changes in its process and appeared retrospective after the debacle, it remains to be seen whether its measures would translate into something concrete to make the supply chain finance domain safer and sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Arijit Bhattacharya & R. R. Reddy, 2026. "Credit Suisse–Greensill Saga: A Case of Risk Management Failure," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 27(4), pages 723-731, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:27:y:2026:i:4:p:723-731
    DOI: 10.1177/09721509221117369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09721509221117369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09721509221117369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:27:y:2026:i:4:p:723-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.