IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v26y2025i3p563-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying and Ranking Processes Influencing Career Path of Knowledge Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Parvaneh Gelard

Abstract

Experts believe that the essentials for the effective use of knowledge employees and their retention in an organization are to develop the necessary motivators for knowledge workers in different domains. In the meantime, the transparency and vividness rate of career paths are among the most significant extrinsic motivators that play an undeniable role in enhancing the motivation of knowledge workers. Hence, this study identified the processes that influenced the career path management of knowledge workers and ranked them based on a descriptive–exploratory inquiry. The statistical population of this study included qualitative and quantitative phases. The statistical population of the qualitative phase consisted of university experts, as well as pundits in human resources management, and knowledge employees in the Tehran Municipality shaped the population of the quantitative phase. The data were collected through library and field studies (semi-structured interviews with experts and a 7-point Likert questionnaire). The content analysis method was employed for the qualitative analysis of the data, and the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach with the grey numbers theory was used for the quantitative analysis of the data. Overall, the qualitative phase gave rise to five influencing factors in the career path management of knowledge employees. Likewise, the findings of the quantitative phase revealed that the empowering processes, with a utility coefficient of 0.271, enjoyed the highest priority and the structural process, with a utility coefficient of 0.125, had the least priority among the processes influencing the career path management of knowledge workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Parvaneh Gelard, 2025. "Identifying and Ranking Processes Influencing Career Path of Knowledge Employees," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 26(3), pages 563-587, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:563-587
    DOI: 10.1177/09721509211027399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09721509211027399
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09721509211027399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:26:y:2025:i:3:p:563-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.