IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v15y2026i2p265-276.html

Effect of Religiosity on Consumer Decision-making: A Serial Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Swati Saini
  • Rajiv Kumar

Abstract

Religiosity is the spine behind a consumer’s mental makeup, directing towards a core need to explore the effect of religiosity on a consumer’s decisions. The study aims at analysing the path between consumers’ religious commitment (RC) and their quality conscious decision-making (QCDM) through fashion conscious and price conscious decisions as serial mediators. The sample was collected from 400 respondents belonging to the Hindu religion in India. Data were analysed and hypotheses were tested for probable relationships using structural equation modelling (SEM) and bootstrapping through the PROCESS macro. The study reflected a positive relationship between RC (intrapersonal) and QCDM. Fashion conscious and price conscious decision-making serially mediated the path between RC and QCDM. The results clearly indicate that religiously committed consumers are fashion conscious, price conscious and quality conscious. Religiosity should be strongly taken into consideration by the companies while analysing consumers’ decision-making processes, as religion is the backbone for all major judgements. This research highlights the path along which a religious consumer’s decision moves. The findings can be incorporated into business strategies for better understanding of consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Swati Saini & Rajiv Kumar, 2026. "Effect of Religiosity on Consumer Decision-making: A Serial Mediation Model," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(2), pages 265-276, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:265-276
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145231188624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145231188624
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145231188624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Dhiman & Pawan Kumar Chand & Sahil Gupta, 2018. "Behavioural Aspects Influencing Decision to Purchase Apparels amongst Young Indian Consumers," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(3), pages 188-200, September.
    2. Malhotra, Deepak, 2010. "(When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect” on pro-social behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 138-143, April.
    3. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Visentin, Marco, 2014. "Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 258-267.
    4. Munazza Saeed & Imran Shafique, 2021. "Green customer-based brand equity and green purchase consumption behaviour: the moderating role of religious commitment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13284-13303, September.
    5. Toti, Jean-François & Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Huaman-Ramirez, Richard, 2021. "Ethical sensitivity in consumers’ decision-making: The mediating and moderating role of internal locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-182.
    6. Donna Ginther & Robert Pollak, 2004. "Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 41(4), pages 671-696, November.
    7. Jiang, Fuxiu & Jiang, Zhan & Kim, Kenneth A. & Zhang, Min, 2015. "Family-firm risk-taking: Does religion matter?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 260-278.
    8. Peter, J Paul & Tarpey, Lawrence X, Sr, 1975. "A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(1), pages 29-37, June.
    9. Lertwannawit, Aurathai & Mandhachitara, Rujirutana, 2012. "Interpersonal effects on fashion consciousness and status consumption moderated by materialism in metropolitan men," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1408-1416.
    10. Tajamul Islam & Uma Chandrasekaran, 2020. "Religiosity and consumer decision making styles of young Indian Muslim consumers," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 147-169, April.
    11. Deepak Malhotra, 2010. "(When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the ``Sunday effect'' on pro-social behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 5(2), pages 138-143, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tze Wei Ooi & Kean Siang Ch’ng & Narayanan Suresh, 2026. "Self-reported religiosity and erosion of honesty in an unmonitored environment with repeated opportunities to cheat: experimental evidence from Malaysia," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 53(1), pages 29-39, March.
    2. F. Atzori & G. Ballicu & V. Pelligra, 2025. "Under Big Gods' Eyes. The Impact of Religious Beliefs on Altruistic Punishment During COVID-19 Pandemic," Working Paper CRENoS 202504, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    3. Osei-Tutu, Francis & Weill, Laurent, 2023. "Individualism reduces borrower discouragement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 370-385.
    4. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Thomas Dobbelstein & Carina Lochner, 2023. "Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2256-2277, August.
    6. Clifton-Sprigg, Joanna, 2014. "Educational spillovers and parental migration," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 2015-46, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Mario Silic & Andrea Back, 2016. "The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 151-185, January.
    8. Song, Lianlian & Hu, Baixue & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Investigating consumer binge-watching behavior: A valence framework perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Meents, S. & Verhagen, T. & Vlaar, P.W.L., 2011. "How sellers can stimulate purchasing in electronic marketplaces: Using information as a risk reduction signal," Serie Research Memoranda 0014, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    12. Chen, Junhong & Nian, Yefan & Gao, Zhifeng, 2022. "Value, Attitude/Belief, and Sustainable Food Consumption," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322485, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. N. Meltem Daysal & Marianne Simonsen & Mircea Trandafir & Sanni Breining, 2022. "Spillover Effects of Early-Life Medical Interventions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(1), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Munazza Saeed & Arhum Ahmed & Erhan Boğan & Osman Abul & Ahmad Qammar, 2025. "‘Buying green’: the role of green customer-based brand equity in shaping customers’ green buying behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5981-5997, March.
    15. Tunca, Burak & Anselmsson, Johan, 2019. "‘You are where you shop’: Examining stereotypes about town center shoppers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 242-252.
    16. V. Hotz & Juan Pantano, 2015. "Strategic parenting, birth order, and school performance," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 911-936, October.
    17. Jeanne Lafortune & Corinne Low, 2023. "Collateralized Marriage," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 252-291, October.
    18. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 0. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    19. Liu, Qigui & Luo, Tianpei & Tian, Gary Gang, 2015. "Family control and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 220-245.
    20. Anam Bhatti & Shahrin Saad & Salimon Maruf Gbadebo, 2019. "Effect of Financial Risk, Privacy Risk and Product Risk on Online Shopping Behavior," Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 7(4), pages :343-356, December.
    21. Marco Francesconi & Stephen Jenkins & Thomas Siedler, 2010. "Childhood family structure and schooling outcomes: evidence for Germany," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 1073-1103, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:265-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.