IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v15y2026i2p221-231.html

A Paradigm for Validating Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Scale in Indian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Yadav
  • B. K. Punia

Abstract

Despite the fact that organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) is unprompted by the organisations, it supports the effective running of organisations throughout a discretionary entity of employees’ behaviour. OCB contributes to the organisation in several ways and helps organisations in achieving sustainable competitiveness. Though, owing to individual behaviour and cultural differences, the magnitude of OCB possibly will change across the countries. This research article intends to validate the instrument for assessing OCB in an Indian context. A sample of 549 employees working in public and private organisations situated in the northern part of India was collected. The study has applied a descriptive research design and the quantitative approach. Five constructs for the OCB assessment were selected for their reliability and validity, using first-order and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results show that there is no reliability and validity issue in this particular scale, and the confirmatory factor analysis of OCB signified that there was a good fit of CFA model data. Findings of this article add to the theoretical and practical legitimacy of OCB measure from an emerging country context.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Yadav & B. K. Punia, 2026. "A Paradigm for Validating Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Scale in Indian Context," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(2), pages 221-231, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:221-231
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145211051166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145211051166
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145211051166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:221-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.