IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v15y2026i2p150-162.html

Rationality and Optimizing Behaviour of Technology-aided Consumers: A Critique on Perspectives of Behavioural Economists

Author

Listed:
  • Vikas Prakash

Abstract

Behavioural economics grew to prominence by challenging the foundational assumptions of standard economic theory, raising questions about the future trajectory of economic thought. This study presents arguments to reinstate trust in the assumptions of consumers’ rationality and their optimizing behaviour. The study brings out how this criticism is inappropriate. Perspectives of leading behavioural economist such as Dan Ariely, Richard Thaler, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky are critically synthesized and startling gaps are spotted. The study motivates researchers to evaluate the impact of technology on rationality of consumers. On one hand, technology has enhanced access to information and processing capability, but on the other hand, it has brought data deluge and confusion. Contemporary innovations such as GenAI-enabled smartphones, e-commerce platforms, chatbots and robots tend to increase consumers’ access to information and processing ability. Thus, aiding humans in achieving full rationality against popular belief of humans having ‘bounded rationality’ which implied inability of humans to possess optimising behaviour. The aid received from technological prowess has been named ‘Aided Rationality’. The study argues for resurgence of faith in standard economic theory and prompts the researchers to study the interaction of ‘Aided rationality’ with ‘data deluge’ and concludes by identifying compelling questions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikas Prakash, 2026. "Rationality and Optimizing Behaviour of Technology-aided Consumers: A Critique on Perspectives of Behavioural Economists," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(2), pages 150-162, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:150-162
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145251358316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145251358316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145251358316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Ariely & George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 2003. ""Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 73-106.
    2. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Xu, Jiuping & Yan, Fang & Li, Steven, 2011. "Vehicle routing optimization with soft time windows in a fuzzy random environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1075-1091.
    5. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    6. Blavatskyy, Pavlo R., 2024. "New discounting functions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. John B. Taylor, 2009. "The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong," NBER Working Papers 14631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Viral Acharya & Thomas Philippon & Matthew Richardson & Nouriel Roubini, 2009. "The Financial Crisis of 2007‐2009: Causes and Remedies," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 89-137, May.
    9. Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2006. "Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on Advances in Behavioral Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 712-721, September.
    10. Walasek, Lukasz & Mullett, Timothy L. & Stewart, Neil, 2024. "A meta-analysis of loss aversion in risky contexts," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Richard H. Thaler, 2016. "Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1577-1600, July.
    12. Paul Kuyer & Bert Gordijn, 2023. "Nudge in perspective: A systematic literature review on the ethical issues with nudging," Rationality and Society, , vol. 35(2), pages 191-230, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Moscati, 2022. "Behavioral and heuristic models are as-if models too — and that’s ok," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 22177, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    2. Heutel, Garth, 2019. "Prospect theory and energy efficiency," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-254.
    3. A. Peter McGraw & Eldar Shafir & Alexander Todorov, 2010. "Valuing Money and Things: Why a $20 Item Can Be Worth More and Less Than $20," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 816-830, May.
    4. Dorian Jullien, 2018. "Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    5. Harin, Alexander, 2019. "Forbidden zones for the expectations of measurement data and problems of behavioral economics," MPRA Paper 91368, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Roxane Bricet, 2018. "Preferences for information precision under ambiguity," Thema Working Papers 2018-09, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    7. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 578-603, May.
    8. Rubilar-Torrealba, Rolando & Ruiz, José L., 2025. "Risk perception and risky asset allocation: A new approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    9. Yechiam, Eldad & Zeif, Dana, 2025. "Loss aversion is not robust: A re-meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Park, Hyeon, 2023. "A general equilibrium model of dynamic loss aversion," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Nadia A. Streletskaya & Samuel D. Bell & Maik Kecinski & Tongzhe Li & Simanti Banerjee & Leah H. Palm‐Forster & David Pannell, 2020. "Agricultural Adoption and Behavioral Economics: Bridging the Gap," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 54-66, March.
    12. Hobman, Elizabeth V. & Frederiks, Elisha R. & Stenner, Karen & Meikle, Sarah, 2016. "Uptake and usage of cost-reflective electricity pricing: Insights from psychology and behavioural economics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 455-467.
    13. Shi, Leilei & Wang, Binghong & Guo, Xinshuai & Li, Honggang, 2021. "A price dynamic equilibrium model with trading volume weights based on a price-volume probability wave differential equation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Georgalos, Konstantinos, 2024. "Gender effects for loss aversion: A reconsideration," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Eyal Ert & Ido Erev, 2010. "On the Descriptive Value of Loss Aversion in Decisions under Risk," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-056, Harvard Business School.
    16. Moshe Levy, 2025. "Relative risk aversion must be close to 1," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 127-135, March.
    17. Harin, Alexander, 2018. "Forbidden zones and biases for the expectation of a random variable. Version 2," MPRA Paper 85607, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Peter J. Phillips & Gabriela Pohl, 2017. "Terrorist choice: a stochastic dominance and prospect theory analysis," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 150-164, March.
    19. Snorre Sylvester Frid-Nielsen & Mads Dagnis Jensen, 2021. "Maps of Behavioural Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 33(2), pages 226-250, July.
    20. Aldo Montesano, 2019. "On some aspects of decision theory under uncertainty: rationality, price-probabilities and the Dutch book argument," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 57-85, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:150-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.