IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v15y2026i2p150-162.html

Rationality and Optimizing Behaviour of Technology-aided Consumers: A Critique on Perspectives of Behavioural Economists

Author

Listed:
  • Vikas Prakash

Abstract

Behavioural economics grew to prominence by challenging the foundational assumptions of standard economic theory, raising questions about the future trajectory of economic thought. This study presents arguments to reinstate trust in the assumptions of consumers’ rationality and their optimizing behaviour. The study brings out how this criticism is inappropriate. Perspectives of leading behavioural economist such as Dan Ariely, Richard Thaler, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky are critically synthesized and startling gaps are spotted. The study motivates researchers to evaluate the impact of technology on rationality of consumers. On one hand, technology has enhanced access to information and processing capability, but on the other hand, it has brought data deluge and confusion. Contemporary innovations such as GenAI-enabled smartphones, e-commerce platforms, chatbots and robots tend to increase consumers’ access to information and processing ability. Thus, aiding humans in achieving full rationality against popular belief of humans having ‘bounded rationality’ which implied inability of humans to possess optimising behaviour. The aid received from technological prowess has been named ‘Aided Rationality’. The study argues for resurgence of faith in standard economic theory and prompts the researchers to study the interaction of ‘Aided rationality’ with ‘data deluge’ and concludes by identifying compelling questions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikas Prakash, 2026. "Rationality and Optimizing Behaviour of Technology-aided Consumers: A Critique on Perspectives of Behavioural Economists," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(2), pages 150-162, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:150-162
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145251358316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145251358316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145251358316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:150-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.