IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v5y1996i4p303-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to Conserving Vulnerable Wildlife in China: Does the Colour of Cat Matter – if it Catches Mice?1

Author

Listed:
  • Richard B. Harris

Abstract

China's environmental problems are well known, but recently its record in the area of wildlife conservation, particularly with regard to endangered species, has come under scrutiny. Environmental values colour how we in the West view both China's past experience with wildlife and what strategies it should adopt to foster better conservation. Chinese have long taken a utilitarian view of wildlife, valuing species primarily as resources for man's use and only secondarily for other reasons. However, China has not developed institutions capable of sustaining the desired use of wildlife in the face of ever-growing demands. I suggest that Western criticisms of Chinese utilitarian attitudes are inappropriate, ineffective, and possibly counter-productive: deep-seated cultural mores change slowly. Instead, Westerners concerned with the fate of China's wildlife should assist the development of systems that act to channel demand for wildlife's material benefits toward investment in conservation. Such systems will likely require devolution of considerable control to local levels, strengthening incentives to favour long- over short-term benefits, and – notwithstanding common Western attitudes – substantial consumptive use of wildlife.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard B. Harris, 1996. "Approaches to Conserving Vulnerable Wildlife in China: Does the Colour of Cat Matter – if it Catches Mice?1," Environmental Values, , vol. 5(4), pages 303-334, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:5:y:1996:i:4:p:303-334
    DOI: 10.1177/096327199600500403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096327199600500403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/096327199600500403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:5:y:1996:i:4:p:303-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.