IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v35y2026i1p21-45.html

Disruptive technologies and intra-value conflicts: The case of naturalness and sustainability in cellular agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Rijssenbeek

    (Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands)

  • Zoë Robaey

    (4508Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands)

  • Vincent Blok

    (4508Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands)

Abstract

Synthetic biology is a highly disruptive technology that particularly affects the agriculture and food production domains. Rather than using farmed animals or crops, synthetic biology allows for ‘cellular agriculture’—the production of agricultural commodities using cell cultures and host micro-organisms. In light of the possibility that cellular agriculture can enable sustainable food production, and considering that most people strongly prefer food that they perceive as natural, this paper is guided by the following research question: how are the values of sustainability and naturalness affected by the disruption of cellular agriculture? We analyze how different stakeholders discuss these values. After demonstrating that the intra-value conflicts evident in sustainability and naturalness are based on different interpretations of these values, we create conceptual clarity in these different interpretations and show how these intra-value conflicts relate to the ongoing divide between ecomodernism and ecology with respect to the future of agriculture and food.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Rijssenbeek & Zoë Robaey & Vincent Blok, 2026. "Disruptive technologies and intra-value conflicts: The case of naturalness and sustainability in cellular agriculture," Environmental Values, , vol. 35(1), pages 21-45, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:21-45
    DOI: 10.1177/09632719251347453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09632719251347453
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09632719251347453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behnam Taebi & Jan H. Kwakkel & Céline Kermisch, 2020. "Governing climate risks in the face of normative uncertainties," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    2. Natalie Herdoiza & Ernst Worrell & Floris Van Den Berg, 2022. "The Expanding Moral Circle as a Framework towards Food Sustainability," Environmental Values, , vol. 31(4), pages 421-440, August.
    3. Hopster, Jeroen, 2021. "What are socially disruptive technologies?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Katz-Rosene, Ryan & Heffernan, Andrew & Arora, Anil, 2023. "Protein pluralism and food systems transition: A review of sustainable protein meta-narratives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. James Karabin & Izaac Mansfield & Emma K Frow, 2021. "Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. repec:sae:envval:v:25:y:2016:i:2:p:195-214 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalpokiene, Julija & Kalpokas, Ignas, 2023. "Creative encounters of a posthuman kind – anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Kamphorst, B.A. & O'Neill, E.R.H., 2025. "Digital recording and the hazards of unbounded moralized judgment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Van Uffelen, N. & Taebi, B. & Pesch, Udo, 2024. "Revisiting the energy justice framework: Doing justice to normative uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Godart, Frédéric & Pistilli, Luca, 2024. "The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Coenen, Tom B.J. & Wiarda, Martijn & Visscher, Klaasjan & Penna, Caetano C.R. & Volker, Leentje, 2025. "Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment as a reflective approach to mission governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Gjefsen, Mads Dahl, 2026. "A promise-attentive triple embeddedness framework, applied to cellular foods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Xi, Xi & Ren, Feifei & Yu, Lean & Yang, Jing, 2023. "Detecting the technology's evolutionary pathway using HiDS-trait-driven tech mining strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Löhr, Guido, 2023. "Conceptual disruption and 21st century technologies: A framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Štefan Bojnec & Umar Daraz & Younas Khan, 2024. "Harvesting Sunlight: The Promise of Agro-Photovoltaic Fusion Systems for Sustainable Agriculture and Renewable Energy Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Papanikolaou, Efstathios & Angelis, Jannis & Moustakis, Vassilis, 2023. "Which type of ecosystem for distributed ledger technology?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. He, Yubing & Lin, Ting & Zhang, Si, 2023. "Does complementary technology within an ecosystem affect disruptive innovation? Evidence from Chinese electric vehicle listed firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Wanqi Li & Huiying Zhao, 2024. "“It’s Up to Me Whether I Do—Or Don’t—Watch Deepfakes†: Deepfakes and Behavioral Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    13. Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rishi Pugazhendhi & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy & Vinoth Ramanathan & Senthilkumar Subramanian & Sachin Kumar & Kamalakannan Nandhagopal & , 2022. "Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Makowska-Curran, Agata, 2026. "From global biodiversity commitments to local action: revenue potential and allocation dynamics of the Cali Fund," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138657, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Van Grunsven, Janna & Marin, Lavinia, 2024. "Technosocial disruption, enactivism, & social media: On the overlooked risks of teenage cancel culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Nynke van Uffelen & Nihit Goyal & Amanda Martinez-Reyes, 2025. "(Not) just policy success: Incorporating justice in policy evaluation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 449-468, September.
    17. Haye Geukes & Udo Pesch & Aad Correljé & Behnam Taebi, 2021. "A Healthy Metaphor? The North Sea Consultation and the Power of Words," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Löhr, Guido, 2023. "Do socially disruptive technologies really change our concepts or just our conceptions?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Dimitris Koryzis & Dionisis Margaris & Costas Vassilakis & Konstantinos Kotis & Dimitris Spiliotopoulos, 2023. "Disruptive Technologies for Parliaments: A Literature Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Wen, Yuni, 2023. "Rightful resistance: How do digital platforms achieve policy change?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:21-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.