IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v31y2022i6p637-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respecting the Nonhuman Other: Individual Natural Otherness and the Case for Incommensurability of Moral Standing

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Wienhues

Abstract

The concept of natural otherness can be found throughout the environmental ethics literature. Drawing on this concept, this article pursues two aims. For one, it argues for an account of individual natural otherness as stable difference as opposed to accounts of natural otherness that put more emphasis on independence for the purpose of differentiating individual natural otherness from the concept of wildness. Secondly, this account of natural otherness is engaged to argue for a particular way of theorising the moral standing of individual nonhuman entities. While individual natural otherness in itself does not provide an account of whether an entity matters morally in itself (that is, whether it is morally considerable); it points to an account of incommensurable moral significance for all entities which are attributed moral considerability. That is an often-overlooked alternative to egalitarian or hierarchical accounts of moral significance. Individual natural otherness understood in this way in turn provides another explanatory story for why relational accounts of environmental ethics that strongly emphasise the importance of concepts such as wildness are particularly salient.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Wienhues, 2022. "Respecting the Nonhuman Other: Individual Natural Otherness and the Case for Incommensurability of Moral Standing," Environmental Values, , vol. 31(6), pages 637-656, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:637-656
    DOI: 10.3197/096327121X16328186623913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327121X16328186623913
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3197/096327121X16328186623913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:637-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.