IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v19y2010i1p79-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal Ethics and the Argument from Absurdity

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Aaltola

Abstract

Arguments for the inherent value, equality of interests, or rights of non-human animals have presented a strong challenge for the anthropocentric worldview. However, they have been met with criticism. One form of criticism maintains that, regardless of their theoretical consistency, these ‘pro-animal arguments’ cannot be accepted due to their absurdity. Often, particularly inter-species interest conflicts are brought to the fore: if pro-animal arguments were followed, we could not solve interest conflicts between species, which is absurd. Because of this absurdity, the arguments need to be abandoned. The paper analyses the strength, background and relevance of this ‘argument from absurdity'. It is claimed that in all of the three areas mentioned above, the argument faces severe difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Aaltola, 2010. "Animal Ethics and the Argument from Absurdity," Environmental Values, , vol. 19(1), pages 79-98, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:79-98
    DOI: 10.3197/096327110X485392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327110X485392
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3197/096327110X485392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:79-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.