IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v44y2026i1p26-44.html

Right-to-place and disability justice: Giving visibility to the often-unseen but integral lived elements in making communities inclusive for all bodyminds

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Stafford
  • Matt Novacevski

Abstract

Being in place is a political statement of rights, citizenship, and spatial justice. In this article, we argue the existential-political connection between place and disability justice is critical to progressing the inclusive communities and cities agenda and Sustainable Development Goal 11 – Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. This is illustrated through our place-based participatory research with 97 people (9-92 years of age) of which over 50% identified as disabled people [1] from two Australian regions – Clarence and greater Hobart Tasmania and Gympie Region Queensland. The lived experiences shared illuminate that while place is essential in making communities inclusive, being-in-place is crucially contingent upon planned and built environments enabling diverse bodyminds to exercise their spatial agency , experience connectedness and dwelling in place. These lived elements are prerequisites to creating more inclusive communities and regions, while integral to the realisation of disability justice spatially and socially.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Stafford & Matt Novacevski, 2026. "Right-to-place and disability justice: Giving visibility to the often-unseen but integral lived elements in making communities inclusive for all bodyminds," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 44(1), pages 26-44, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:44:y:2026:i:1:p:26-44
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544251349637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544251349637
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544251349637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    2. Theresa Enright, 2019. "Transit justice as spatial justice: learning from activists," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 665-680, September.
    3. Kurt Iveson, 2011. "Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 250-259, April.
    4. Jamie Staples & Stephen Essex, 2016. "Design, Disability and the Planning Challenge: The Reality of Living with Severely Disabled Children," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 327-346, May.
    5. Lisa Stafford & Leonor Vanik & Lisa K. Bates & Lisa Stafford & Leonor Vanik & Lisa Stafford & Ron Buliung & Rhonda Cheryl Solomon & Pippa Rogers & Hannah E. Silver & Daniel Salomon & Minji Cho & Gail , 2022. "Disability Justice and Urban Planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 101-142, January.
    6. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levine, Kaylyn & Karner, Alex, 2023. "Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-74.
    2. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    3. Ali Hosseini & Ebrahim Farhadi & Fatema Hussaini & Ahmad Pourahmad & Nooshin Seraj Akbari, 2022. "Analysis of spatial (in)equality of urban facilities in Tehran: an integration of spatial accessibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6527-6555, May.
    4. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:10:p:2794-2803 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    6. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Caris, Ethan & Cao, Mengqiu, 2024. "Investigating contestation around neighbourhood scale active travel infrastructure policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 95-107.
    8. Juan Camilo Mansilla & Normand Boucher & François Routhier, 2024. "Public Transport in the Disabling City: A Narrative Ethnography of Dilemmas and Strategies of People with Mobility Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Ivanova, Oxana & O'Hern, Steve, 2024. "Mobility of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals: A systematic literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Safiyeh Tayebi & Seyed Ali Alavi & Saeed Esfandi & Leyla Meshkani & Aliakbar Shamsipour, 2023. "Evaluation of Land Use Efficiency in Tehran’s Expansion between 1986 and 2021: Developing an Assessment Framework Using DEMATEL and Interpretive Structural Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    12. Ruixia Chao & Desheng Xue & Benshuo Wang, 2024. "Evaluating Human Needs: A Study on the Spatial Justice of Medical Facility Services in Social Housing Communities in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:pn2qd_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    15. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    16. Ruben Garnica-Monroy & Seraphim Alvanides, 2019. "Spatial segregation and urban form in Mexican cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1347-1361, September.
    17. Anna Nikolaeva & S Shakthi, 2026. "Moving towards gender-sensitive urban mobility planning: Unpacking the role of knowledge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(2), pages 205-224, February.
    18. Ilan Wiesel & Fanqi Liu, 2021. "Conceptualising modes of redistribution in public urban infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1561-1580, June.
    19. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    20. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    21. Alba Ramírez Saiz & Andrea Alonso & Delfín Jiménez Martín & Patxi Lamíquiz, 2022. "Can Proximal Environments Prevent Social Inequalities Amongst People of All Ages and Abilities? An Integrative Literature Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-31, October.
    22. Barber, Lachlan B., 2020. "Governing uneven mobilities: Walking and hierarchized circulation in Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:44:y:2026:i:1:p:26-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.