IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i7p1426-1446.html

‘A bureaucracy within a bureaucracy’: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and relationships under the Maa-nulth Treaty

Author

Listed:
  • Onyx Sloan Morgan

Abstract

Despite the acknowledgement of the importance of relations with the ocean for nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ ways of being, relationships between Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ Nations remain rife with power inequities. The existence, form, and right for nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ to practice fishing, including commercial fishing, is one such flashpoint where relationships with DFO and thus Canada’s policy and general orientation to First Nations are strained. Even for huuÊ•iiÊ”atḥ, one of the five First Nations signatories to the Maa-nulth Treaty, coming to the table as equal treaty partners has been difficult due to DFO’s orientation to nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ fishing rights, the hierarchy of scientific knowledges, and lack of recognitions of legal authorities through hawiÅ‚patak hawiih. Based on our 10 years of research into the implementation of the Maa-nulth Treaty, in this paper we explore the relationship between Huu-ay-aht First Nations and DFO. To do so, we begin by overviewing the process of reserve creation across nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ ḥaḥuuÅ‚i and how colonial understandings and creations of ‘fisheries’ played a key role in dispossession. We then turn to our interviews with Maa-nulth First Nations negotiation and implementation teams to explore how reconciliation and fishing rights have emerged through the Maa-nulth Treaty, and how nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ knowledges have been disregarded by the DFO. We conclude by profiling the tensions, strengths, and challenges huuÊ•iiÊ”atḥ have experienced in exercising their treaty rights, inclusive of hawiÅ‚patak hawiih, through the Maa-nulth Treaty and specifically with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyx Sloan Morgan, 2025. "‘A bureaucracy within a bureaucracy’: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and relationships under the Maa-nulth Treaty," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(7), pages 1426-1446, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:7:p:1426-1446
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544251334524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544251334524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544251334524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:7:p:1426-1446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.