IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i5p937-955.html

Exploring challenges and politics of knowledge production in the global South - Evidence from Bangladesh’s aid and development sector

Author

Listed:
  • Palash Kamruzzaman

Abstract

This article takes Bangladesh as a case study and explores the motivations (or lack of), challenges, and politics of knowledge production with a particular focus on development scholarship and practice. This piece is based on qualitative research methods and draws from 25 semi structured interviews with highly experienced and senior Bangladeshi development practitioners and academics. Empirical evidence and consequent analysis presented in this work contribute to the debates around the schism in access to resources, politics of aid, and power over knowledge production. This article also reveals local cultural contexts as consultancy works are perceived to be more financially rewarding. This is manifested through current practices that have created a condition where local researchers and practitioners feel they have no time (or incentive and motivation) to engage in knowledge production. Moreover, this article explores whether one’s race and/or nationality play any role in knowledge production, and how the respondents reflect about these issues based on their lived experience. In doing so, findings of this study further the arguments of structural inequality and colour-blind approach within aid and global development landscape. This article offers a rich account of how existing practices favour staff members from the donor countries and exclude Bangladeshi researchers and practitioners from knowledge production processes. This article also brings forward an important issue which highlights that, as perceived by the respondents of this study, one’s institutional affiliation with prestigious Western institutions might matter more in knowledge production (as we know it) than the content, ideas and credibility of knowledge that are generated in the global South. This article contends that by excluding, rejecting, side-lining, and subjugating knowledges produced in the global South development policies and practices will continue to manufacture a particular type of knowledge that will circumvent equity in knowledge production and perpetuate Western hegemony.

Suggested Citation

  • Palash Kamruzzaman, 2025. "Exploring challenges and politics of knowledge production in the global South - Evidence from Bangladesh’s aid and development sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(5), pages 937-955, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:5:p:937-955
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544241299931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544241299931
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544241299931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Welch & Rebecca Piekkari, 2006. "Crossing language boundaries: Qualitative interviewing in international business," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 417-437, August.
    2. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2017. "Understanding the Role of National Development Experts in Development Ethnography," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(1), pages 39-63, January.
    3. Molly Sundberg, 2023. "Local Recruits in Development Finance Institutions: Relocating Global North-South Divides in the International Aid Industry," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 1635-1651, November.
    4. Faaland, J. & Parkinson, J. R., 1976. "Bangladesh: Gradual development or deepening misery?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(9), pages 739-747, September.
    5. Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira & Yijia Jing & Paul Collins & Nilima Gulrajani, 2015. "Dilemmas in Donor Design: Organisational Reform and the Future of Foreign Aid Agencies," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 152-164, May.
    6. Palash Kamruzzaman & Emmanuel Kumi, 2023. "Why national development experts are not included in development policy‐making and practice: The case of Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    7. Silke Roth, 2019. "Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 38-54, March.
    8. Ishbel McWha, 2011. "The roles of, and relationships between, expatriates, volunteers, and local development workers," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 29-40, February.
    9. Matthias Kranke, 2022. "Exclusive expertise: the boundary work of international organizations," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 453-476, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gemma Sou, 2022. "Aid micropolitics: Everyday southern resistance to racialized and geographical assumptions of expertise," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(4), pages 876-894, June.
    2. Michael Chasukwa & Angela Crack, 2024. "Participatory translation and anti‐racism in NGO development work: A method of co‐producing translations with community members," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(4), July.
    3. Nurmi, Niina & Koroma, Johanna, 2020. "The emotional benefits and performance costs of building a psychologically safe language climate in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    4. Child, John & Hsieh, Linda & Elbanna, Said & Karmowska, Joanna & Marinova, Svetla & Puthusserry, Pushyarag & Tsai, Terence & Narooz, Rose & Zhang, Yunlu, 2017. "SME international business models: The role of context and experience," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 664-679.
    5. Khakhar, Priyan & Rammal, Hussain Gulzar, 2013. "Culture and business networks: International business negotiations with Arab managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 578-590.
    6. David S. A. Guttormsen & Fiona Moore, 2023. "‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 531-559, August.
    7. Elisa Savelli & Klaas Schwartz & Rhodante Ahlers, 2019. "The Dutch aid and trade policy: Policy discourses versus development practices in the Kenyan water and sanitation sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(6), pages 1126-1147, September.
    8. Erin E. Makarius & Aloysius M. Kahindi & Charles E. Stevens & Emma Kyoungseo Hong, 2025. "Reputational judgments of foreign MNEs’ societal impact in frontier markets: the role of compatible, crossed, and conflicting signals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(7), pages 901-920, September.
    9. Helene Tenzer & Siri Terjesen & Anne-Wil Harzing, 2017. "Language in International Business: A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 815-854, December.
    10. Bausch, Madeleine & Barmeyer, Christoph & Mayrhofer, Ulrike, 2022. "Facilitating factors in the cross-cultural transfer of management practices: The case of a German multinational in Brazil," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    11. Minasyan, Anna, 2018. "US aid, US educated leaders and economic ideology," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 244-257.
    12. Outila, Virpi & Mihailova, Irina & Reiche, B. Sebastian & Piekkari, Rebecca, 2020. "A communicative perspective on the trust-control link in Russia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    13. Steven Dellaportas & Lina Xu & Sophia Ji & Dudu Luo & Xiaoming Song, 2024. "The challenges facing Chinese accounting scholars publishing in English (and Chinese) language journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(2), pages 1827-1848, June.
    14. Mariam Kunchuliya & Frank Eckardt, 2024. "Psychogeography of Refugee Youth from Ukraine in Weimar, Germany: Navigating the Sense of Belonging in the Context of Liminality," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-40, August.
    15. Suzuki, Mao, 2020. "Profits before patients? Analyzing donors’ economic motives for foreign aid in the health sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Jinwen Chen, 2022. "Space, Time and Structure: Unpacking Relationships in International Development Volunteering," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 22(4), pages 335-351, October.
    17. Silke Roth, 2019. "Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 38-54, March.
    18. Salim Al-Hashmi, 2021. "A Study on the Impact of the Sudden Change to Online Education on the Motivation of Higher Education Students," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-78, August.
    19. Viviane Frings‐Hessami & Gillian Oliver, 2022. "Clashes of cultures in an international aid organisation: Information cultures, languages and the use of information systems," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1414-1429, October.
    20. Muethel, Miriam & Hoegl, Martin, 2012. "The influence of social institutions on managers’ concept of trust: Implications for trust-building in Sino-German relationships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 420-434.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:5:p:937-955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.