IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i5p937-955.html

Exploring challenges and politics of knowledge production in the global South - Evidence from Bangladesh’s aid and development sector

Author

Listed:
  • Palash Kamruzzaman

Abstract

This article takes Bangladesh as a case study and explores the motivations (or lack of), challenges, and politics of knowledge production with a particular focus on development scholarship and practice. This piece is based on qualitative research methods and draws from 25 semi structured interviews with highly experienced and senior Bangladeshi development practitioners and academics. Empirical evidence and consequent analysis presented in this work contribute to the debates around the schism in access to resources, politics of aid, and power over knowledge production. This article also reveals local cultural contexts as consultancy works are perceived to be more financially rewarding. This is manifested through current practices that have created a condition where local researchers and practitioners feel they have no time (or incentive and motivation) to engage in knowledge production. Moreover, this article explores whether one’s race and/or nationality play any role in knowledge production, and how the respondents reflect about these issues based on their lived experience. In doing so, findings of this study further the arguments of structural inequality and colour-blind approach within aid and global development landscape. This article offers a rich account of how existing practices favour staff members from the donor countries and exclude Bangladeshi researchers and practitioners from knowledge production processes. This article also brings forward an important issue which highlights that, as perceived by the respondents of this study, one’s institutional affiliation with prestigious Western institutions might matter more in knowledge production (as we know it) than the content, ideas and credibility of knowledge that are generated in the global South. This article contends that by excluding, rejecting, side-lining, and subjugating knowledges produced in the global South development policies and practices will continue to manufacture a particular type of knowledge that will circumvent equity in knowledge production and perpetuate Western hegemony.

Suggested Citation

  • Palash Kamruzzaman, 2025. "Exploring challenges and politics of knowledge production in the global South - Evidence from Bangladesh’s aid and development sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(5), pages 937-955, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:5:p:937-955
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544241299931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544241299931
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544241299931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Welch & Rebecca Piekkari, 2006. "Crossing language boundaries: Qualitative interviewing in international business," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 417-437, August.
    2. Faaland, J. & Parkinson, J. R., 1976. "Bangladesh: Gradual development or deepening misery?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(9), pages 739-747, September.
    3. Palash Kamruzzaman & Emmanuel Kumi, 2023. "Why national development experts are not included in development policy‐making and practice: The case of Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    4. Silke Roth, 2019. "Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 38-54, March.
    5. Ishbel McWha, 2011. "The roles of, and relationships between, expatriates, volunteers, and local development workers," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 29-40, February.
    6. Matthias Kranke, 2022. "Exclusive expertise: the boundary work of international organizations," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 453-476, March.
    7. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2017. "Understanding the Role of National Development Experts in Development Ethnography," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(1), pages 39-63, January.
    8. Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira & Yijia Jing & Paul Collins & Nilima Gulrajani, 2015. "Dilemmas in Donor Design: Organisational Reform and the Future of Foreign Aid Agencies," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 152-164, May.
    9. Molly Sundberg, 2023. "Local Recruits in Development Finance Institutions: Relocating Global North-South Divides in the International Aid Industry," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 1635-1651, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gemma Sou, 2022. "Aid micropolitics: Everyday southern resistance to racialized and geographical assumptions of expertise," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(4), pages 876-894, June.
    2. Michael Chasukwa & Angela Crack, 2024. "Participatory translation and anti‐racism in NGO development work: A method of co‐producing translations with community members," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(4), July.
    3. Elisa Savelli & Klaas Schwartz & Rhodante Ahlers, 2019. "The Dutch aid and trade policy: Policy discourses versus development practices in the Kenyan water and sanitation sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(6), pages 1126-1147, September.
    4. Erin E. Makarius & Aloysius M. Kahindi & Charles E. Stevens & Emma Kyoungseo Hong, 2025. "Reputational judgments of foreign MNEs’ societal impact in frontier markets: the role of compatible, crossed, and conflicting signals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(7), pages 901-920, September.
    5. Helene Tenzer & Siri Terjesen & Anne-Wil Harzing, 2017. "Language in International Business: A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 815-854, December.
    6. Bausch, Madeleine & Barmeyer, Christoph & Mayrhofer, Ulrike, 2022. "Facilitating factors in the cross-cultural transfer of management practices: The case of a German multinational in Brazil," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    7. Minasyan, Anna, 2018. "US aid, US educated leaders and economic ideology," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 244-257.
    8. Outila, Virpi & Mihailova, Irina & Reiche, B. Sebastian & Piekkari, Rebecca, 2020. "A communicative perspective on the trust-control link in Russia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    9. Steven Dellaportas & Lina Xu & Sophia Ji & Dudu Luo & Xiaoming Song, 2024. "The challenges facing Chinese accounting scholars publishing in English (and Chinese) language journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(2), pages 1827-1848, June.
    10. Suzuki, Mao, 2020. "Profits before patients? Analyzing donors’ economic motives for foreign aid in the health sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Goutsmedt, Aurélien & Sergi, Francesco, 2024. "Redefining Scientisation: Central Banks between Science and Politics," SocArXiv dxvfp, Center for Open Science.
    12. Wang, Qiu & Clegg, Jeremy & Gajewska-De Mattos, Hanna & Buckley, Peter, 2020. "The role of emotions in intercultural business communication: Language standardization in the context of international knowledge transfer," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    13. Hanwei Li, 2020. "How to Retain Global Talent? Economic and Social Integration of Chinese Students in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Palash Kamruzzaman & Emmanuel Kumi, 2023. "Why national development experts are not included in development policy‐making and practice: The case of Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    15. Sri Seti Indriani & Deddy Mulyana, 2021. "Communication Patterns of Indonesian Diaspora Women in Their Mixed Culture Families," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1431-1448, December.
    16. Louise Marie Busck-Lumholt & Esteve Corbera & Ole Mertz, 2025. "Why Target Communities Remain Subjects Rather than Partners of Development Agencies in Integrated Conservation and Development Projects in Latin America," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(1), pages 100-123, February.
    17. Tser-Yieth Chen & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "Dual Pathways of Value Endorsement in Green Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Frances Fabian & Henry Molina & Giuseppe Labianca, 2009. "Understanding Decisions to Internationalize by Small and Medium-sized Firms Located in an Emerging Market," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 537-563, October.
    19. Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe & Tafadzwa C. Maramura & Israel K. Ekanade & Hannah Muzee, 2020. "The Socio-Political Dynamic Import of Citizens Participation in Public Resource Management in Relation to Good Governance for South Africa," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(3), pages 12-21.
    20. Dolgopyatova, Tatiana & Libman, Alexander & Yakovlev, Andrei, 2018. "Unintended Benefits of Empowering Boards in Conglomerates: A Case Study of AFK Sistema," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 177-202.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:5:p:937-955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.