IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i3p558-575.html

Geek saviours to the rescue? Primitive accumulation, astropropriation, and exoimperialism in NewSpace entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Martinez Dy
  • David Roberts

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the contemporary commercial space race – colloquially known as NewSpace – from a Marxian, technofeminist and decolonial perspective. Theorising the emergent entrepreneurial activities aimed at the human colonisation and exploitation of outer space as part of an ongoing process of primitive accumulation, we contribute innovative conceptualisations of 21st century entrepreneurial space adventurism as exoimperialism, and the privatisation of outer space resources as astropropriation . We develop the notion of geek saviourism as a function of the new geek hegemony within normative white masculinity, used to justify species-level risk under the auspices of homo entrepreneurus, a subgenre of homo economicus. Our critical examination exhorts extreme caution regarding NewSpace entrepreneurial activities, given the longstanding trajectory of entrepreneurial coloniality they reproduce, the mythoi from which they stem, and the devastatingly unequal sociogeny they can generate.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Martinez Dy & David Roberts, 2025. "Geek saviours to the rescue? Primitive accumulation, astropropriation, and exoimperialism in NewSpace entrepreneurship," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(3), pages 558-575, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:3:p:558-575
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544241271475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544241271475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544241271475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John O. Ogbor, 2000. "Mythicizing and Reification in Entrepreneurial Discourse: Ideology‐Critique of Entrepreneurial Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 605-635, July.
    2. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Mazzucato, Mariana, 2019. "The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 936-948.
    3. Victor L. Shammas & Tomas B. Holen, 2019. "One giant leap for capitalistkind: private enterprise in outer space," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Michael Lounsbury & Joel Gehman & Mary Ann Glynn, 2019. "Beyond Homo Entrepreneurus: Judgment and the Theory of Cultural Entrepreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1214-1236, September.
    5. Judy Wajcman, 2010. "Feminist theories of technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 143-152, January.
    6. Andrew Baldwin, 2017. "Climate change, migration, and the crisis of humanism," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), May.
    7. Alexandra Witze, 2020. "How the fight over a Hawaii mega-telescope could change astronomy," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7791), pages 457-458, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fuchs, Sebastian H. & Vorley, Tim & Ventresca, Marc J., 2024. "A primer to new space business - Beyond “Business in space: The new frontier” (Goodrich, Kitmacher and Amtey, 1987)," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    2. Paloma Fernandez Perez & Eleanor Hamilton, 2007. "Gender and family firms: an interdisciplinary approach," Working Papers in Economics 171, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    3. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    4. Hufnagl, Miriam, 2025. "Unboxing innovation policy strategies: An empirical exploration on objectives, coordination, and capacity," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 91, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Verheul, Ingrid & Thurik, Roy & Grilo, Isabel & van der Zwan, Peter, 2012. "Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 325-341.
    6. James Cummings, 2020. "“Look How Many Gays There Are Here”: Digital Technologies and Non-Heterosexual Space in Haikou," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 347-357.
    7. Yosr Ben Tahar & Sarah Mussol, 2017. "Entrepreneurial storytelling : A mean for legitimacy and opportunity exploitation [Le storytelling entrepreneurial: un moyen de légitimation et d'exploitation des opportunités]," Post-Print hal-01625964, HAL.
    8. Elina Meliou & Mustafa Ozbilgin, 2024. "How is the Illusio of Gender Equality in Entrepreneurship Sustained? A Bourdieusian Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1536-1561, June.
    9. Steyaert, Chris, 2007. "Of course that is not the whole (toy) story: Entrepreneurship and the cat's cradle," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 733-751, September.
    10. Hassan Shahraki, 2022. "Three-Dimensional Paradigm of Rural Prosperity: A Feast of Rural Embodiment, Post-Neoliberalism, and Sustainability," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Rachel Brydolf-Horwitz, 2022. "Embodied and entangled: Slow violence and harm via digital technologies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 391-408, March.
    12. Alessio Terzi & Monika Sherwood & Aneil Singh, 2023. "European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 842-857.
    13. Ana Tur-Porcar & Alicia Mas-Tur & José Antonio Belso, 2017. "Barriers to women entrepreneurship. Different methods, different results?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2019-2034, September.
    14. Paolo Castelnuovo & Stefano Clo & Massimo Florio, 2021. "Space policy drives innovation through technological procurement: evidence from Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_08.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:450-468 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Gupta, Vishal K. & Goktan, A. Banu & Gunay, Gonca, 2014. "Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: A stereotype threat perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 273-288.
    17. Bögenhold, Dieter & Heinonen, Jarna & Akola, Elisa, 2013. "Entrepreneurship and Independent Professionals: Why do Professionals not meet with Stereotypes of Entrepreneurship?," MPRA Paper 51529, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Anuradha Mathrani & Rahila Umer & Tarushikha Sarvesh & Janak Adhikari, 2023. "Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Schoen, Antoine & Larédo, Philippe & Gallart, Jordi Molas & Warnke, Philine & Kuhlmann, Stefan & Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo, 2021. "Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Philip Faulkner & Clive Lawson & Jochen Runde, 2010. "Theorising technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    21. Tomasz Zema & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Models of Electricity Price Forecasting: Bibliometric Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:3:p:558-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.