IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i3p416-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faith, bordering and modern slavery: A UK case study

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Waite
  • Hannah Lewis
  • Rebecca Murray
  • Emma Tomalin

Abstract

In this paper we consider the imbrication of UK immigration and border controls into support environments of the anti-modern slavery sphere. We draw on the findings of a 3.5 years ESRC-funded study to explore how the increasingly strident government anti-migrant agenda - broadly seen in the ‘hostile environment’, a culture of disbelief and an overarching preeminence of border controls over human rights protections - is percolating into care providers in the modern slavery sector. Bordering in this sector has not had the same level of scrutiny as within the asylum sector, yet is a particularly interesting site to explore due to the confluence of caring and control impulses. The fresh insight we bring to this context is a focus on the notable presence of faith-based organisations in this sphere. We consider the implications of the relationships between faith, support and bordering - both for those subjected to immigration controls, and those working inextricably within them to support individuals exiting exploitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Waite & Hannah Lewis & Rebecca Murray & Emma Tomalin, 2025. "Faith, bordering and modern slavery: A UK case study," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(3), pages 416-432, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:3:p:416-432
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544231212208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544231212208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544231212208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:3:p:416-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.