IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v43y2025i2p288-306.html

Decentralisation advocacy and inter-government coordination: A local government association perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Steven R Henderson

Abstract

Local government engages in inter-government advocacy to increase functional and financial autonomy and to better respond to community needs. Adopted narratives frequently highlight the problems of centralisation and the perceived benefits of decentralisation, not least democratic proximity. This paper conceptualises local government advocacy within the context of the strategic-relational state and regionalised new state spaces, and distinguishes between advocacy as an assemblage of ambitions and practices and advocacy as a source of analytical insight. The relevance of normative perspectives in enabling critical reflection is further acknowledged. In consideration of local government association advocacy in devolved Scotland, a three-dimensional analytical perspective is embedded whereby Schumacher’s normative interpretation of decentralisation is used to analyse advocacy narratives; local government advocacy enables reflection upon inter-government relations and regionalisation; and evidence of strained inter-government relations prompts further consideration of normative interpretations. Conclusions highlight that local government must guard against scalar privileging in response to problematised relationships; that regionalisation perspectives must give considered attention to inter-government coordination and that community empowerment requires further elaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven R Henderson, 2025. "Decentralisation advocacy and inter-government coordination: A local government association perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(2), pages 288-306, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:2:p:288-306
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544241268118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544241268118
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544241268118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven R. Henderson, 2020. "Local government advocacy in the ‘suburban age’: an institutionalist interpretation of Melbourne’s evolving sub-metropolitan regional structures," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 116-138, January.
    2. Brenner, Neil, 2004. "New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270064.
    3. Mark Evans & David Marsh & Gerry Stoker, 2013. "Understanding localism, Part 2," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5-6), pages 491-491, November.
    4. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    5. Fabrizio Barca & Philip McCann & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2012. "The Case For Regional Development Intervention: Place‐Based Versus Place‐Neutral Approaches," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 134-152, February.
    6. Sarah Ayres & Matthew Flinders & Mark Sandford, 2018. "Territory, power and statecraft: understanding English devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 853-864, June.
    7. John Allen & Allan Cochrane, 2007. "Beyond the Territorial Fix: Regional Assemblages, Politics and Power," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1161-1175.
    8. Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Rhys Jones, 2005. "Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 421-436.
    9. Mark Evans & David Marsh & Gerry Stoker, 2013. "Understanding localism," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 401-407, July.
    10. Steven R. Henderson, 2021. "Policy mobility, advocacy and problem–potential bridging practices: A review of Scottish city council tax incremental financing business cases," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1811-1830, July.
    11. Steven R. Henderson, 2018. "Advocating within and outside the shadow of hierarchy: local government responses to Melbourne’s outer suburban deficits," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 649-669, September.
    12. Neil Barnett, 2020. "English local government and the local trap," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 604-621, July.
    13. Angela O’Hagan & Claire MacRae & Clementine Hill O’Connor & Paul Teedon, 2020. "Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 446-456, July.
    14. Dennis de Widt & Martin Laffin, 2018. "Representing territorial diversity: the role of local government associations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 1585-1594, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    2. Allan Cochrane, 2012. "Making up a Region: The Rise and Fall of the ‘South East of England’ as a Political Territory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 95-108, February.
    3. David Clelland, 2022. "New regions in the periphery: Agency and politics in shaping the governance of regional development in the Scotland–England border region," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(6), pages 421-439, September.
    4. HaeRan Shin & Se Hoon Park & Jung Won Sonn, 2015. "The emergence of a multiscalar growth regime and scalar tension: the politics of urban development in Songdo New City, South Korea," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1618-1638, December.
    5. Kate Broadhurst & Edward Steane & Vlad Mykhnenko & Nicholas Gray, 2023. "Intergovernmental dynamics in responding to COVID-19 in English and Australian cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 185-196.
    6. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.
    7. Danny MacKinnon & Louise Kempton & Peter O’Brien & Emma Ormerod & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2022. "Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places [The shadow of the Pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 39-56.
    8. John Harrison, 2008. "Stating the Production of Scales: Centrally Orchestrated Regionalism, Regionally Orchestrated Centralism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 922-941, December.
    9. Stephen M McCauley & James T Murphy, 2013. "Smart Growth and the Scalar Politics of Land Management in the Greater Boston Region, Usa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(12), pages 2852-2867, December.
    10. Jacob Salder, 2013. "Redeveloping local economic strategy for the post-regionalist era: A contextual benchmarking approach," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 752-769, November.
    11. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    12. Roger Keil, 2011. "The Global City Comes Home," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2495-2517, September.
    13. Andrew E. G. Jonas & Andrew R. Goetz & Sutapa Bhattacharjee, 2014. "City-regionalism as a Politics of Collective Provision: Regional Transport Infrastructure in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2444-2465, August.
    14. Xiaobo Su, 2012. "Transnational Regionalization and the Rescaling of the Chinese State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1327-1347, June.
    15. Nicolas Lewis & Laurence Murphy, 2015. "Anchor organisations in Auckland: Rolling constructively with neoliberalism?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(1), pages 98-118, February.
    16. Stefania Fiorentino & Amy K Glasmeier & Linda Lobao & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2024. "‘Left behind places’: What can be done about them?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 259-274.
    17. Roestamy, Martin & Martin, Abraham Yazdi & Rusli, Radif Khotamir & Fulazzaky, Mohamad Ali, 2022. "A review of the reliability of land bank institution in Indonesia for effective land management of public interest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Edward Yates & Ian Clark & William Rossiter, 2021. "Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 115-132, March.
    19. David L Prytherch, 2010. "‘Vertebrating’ the Region as Networked Space of Flows: Learning from the Spatial Grammar of Catalanist Territoriality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(7), pages 1537-1554, July.
    20. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:2:p:288-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.