IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i1p148-164.html

State-led stigmatisation of place and the politics of the exception

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Høier Olsen
  • Henrik Gutzon Larsen

Abstract

Ghetto area’ has become an official categorisation in Danish housing policy. This article investigates how this stigmatising spatialisation of politics and policy has emerged through evolving storylines for particular housing estates, which gradually have come to structure political debate and become institutionalised in official policy. While political actors can draw on different storylines, it is argued that a range of storylines and associated quantifiable criteria combine to produce a generic ‘ghetto place’ in Danish politics. This scale-framing and objectification have enabled a politics of the exception, making it possible to apply extraordinary measures to particular places. This has significant effects for inhabitants in these places and the cities in which they are located, and it is proposed that, in the longer term, the politics of the exception could also become a battering ram against the collectively owned non-profit housing sector in Denmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Høier Olsen & Henrik Gutzon Larsen, 2023. "State-led stigmatisation of place and the politics of the exception," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(1), pages 148-164, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:148-164
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544221119387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544221119387
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544221119387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loretta Lees & David Ley, 2008. "Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2379-2384, November.
    2. Luise Noring & David Struthers & Adam Grydehøj, 2022. "Governing and financing affordable housing at the intersection of the market and the state: Denmark’s private non-profit housing system," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 258-274, March.
    3. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    4. Brett Christophers, 2022. "Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 698-716, March.
    5. Alistair Sisson, 2021. "DENIGRATING BY NUMBERS: Quantification, Statistics and Territorial Stigma," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 407-422, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjarke Skærlund Risager, 2023. "Territorial stigmatization and housing commodification under racial neoliberalism: The case of Denmark's ‘ghettos’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 850-870, June.
    2. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    3. Nagao, Kenkichi & Edgington, David W., 2023. "Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Szymon Marcińczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Šódź, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    5. Debrunner, Gabriela & Kaufmann, David, 2023. "Land valuation in densifying cities: The negotiation process between institutional landowners and municipal planning authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Jordi Bonshoms-Guzman, 2025. "Laboratory Barcelona: Tenants, corporate landlords and housing justice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(16), pages 3148-3166, December.
    7. Alessandro Rigolon & Timothy Collins, 2023. "The green gentrification cycle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 770-785, March.
    8. Richard Bärnthaler & Andreas Novy & Lea Arzberger & Astrid Krisch & Hans Volmary, 2024. "The power to transform structures: power complexes and the challenges for realising a wellbeing economy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Daniel Sanfelici & Maira Magnani, 2023. "Unpacking corporate ownership in property markets: A typology of investors and the making of an investment value chain in Brazil," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(7), pages 1649-1669, October.
    10. Gergely Olt & Borbála Simonovits & Anikó Bernát & Adrienne Csizmady, 2024. "Housing Commodification and Increasing Potential Ground Rents in Post‐Socialist Budapest," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 126-141, February.
    11. Selim Banabak, 2024. "Closing the Rent Index Gap – A Quantitative Approach to Rental‐Sector Gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 64-80, February.
    12. Matthias Bernt, 2012. "The ‘Double Movements’ of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3045-3062, November.
    13. Darshan Vigneswaran, 2020. "International Migration and Gentrification: Territorial Exclusion at National and Urban Scales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 557-576, May.
    14. Wenda Doff & Reinout Kleinhans, 2011. "Residential Outcomes of Forced Relocation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 661-680, March.
    15. Emily McGirr & Andrejs Skaburskis & Tim Spence Donegani, 2015. "Expectations, preferences and satisfaction levels among new and long-term residents in a gentrifying Toronto neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(1), pages 3-19, January.
    16. Chunhui Liu & Yaqi Yuan & Xiaoming Qi, 2024. "Who Cashed the Rent Gap? An Alternative Narration of a Shantytown Renovation Project in Nanjing, China," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 112-125, February.
    17. Marc Doussard, 2025. "Post-entrepreneurial cities? Runaway housing costs and the humanitarian turn in urban governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(7), pages 880-898, October.
    18. Yetong Mai & Junzhu Wu & Qianying Zhang & Qiqi Liang & Yingying Ma & Zhuojun Liu, 2022. "Confront or Comply? Managing Social Risks in China’s Urban Renewal Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Brian Doucet & Ronald van Kempen & Jan van Weesep, 2011. "‘We're a Rich City with Poor People’: Municipal Strategies of New-Build Gentrification in Rotterdam and Glasgow," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1438-1454, June.
    20. Nadine Marquardt & Henning Füller & Georg Glasze & Robert Pütz, 2013. "Shaping the Urban Renaissance: New-build Luxury Developments in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1540-1556, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:148-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.