IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v25y2007i2p194-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plugging the Accountability Gap? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regional Scrutiny

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Ashworth

    (Centre for Local and Regional Government Research, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, Wales)

  • Stephanie Snape

    (Local Government Centre, Warwick Business School, Coventry University, Coventry CV4 7AL, England)

  • Sundeep Aulakh

    (EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd, St. James House, Vicar Lane, Sheffield S1 2EX, England)

Abstract

The UK government contends that regional assemblies can assist in reducing the democratic deficit in the English regions. This paper presents a preliminary assessment of the new scrutiny role performed by the assemblies. Our conceptual framework identifies five variables which might influence the effectiveness of regional scrutiny. Regional scrutiny is found to be quite distinct from that conducted by parliament, local government, and other devolved institutions. Analysis of qualitative data suggests that regional scrutiny has been limited by a lack of clearly defined powers, inadequate technical support, and an often ‘cosy’ relationship between assemblies and their Regional Development Agencies. We conclude that regional assemblies urgently require appropriate legitimacy, powers, and resources in order to prevent the accountability gap from widening.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Ashworth & Stephanie Snape & Sundeep Aulakh, 2007. "Plugging the Accountability Gap? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regional Scrutiny," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(2), pages 194-211, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:194-211
    DOI: 10.1068/c55m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c55m
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c55m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:194-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.