IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v53y2026i2p377-397.html

TravelAgent: Generative agents in the built environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ariel Noyman
  • Kai Hu
  • Kent Larson

Abstract

Understanding human behavior in the built environment is critical for designing highly-functional, human-centered urban spaces. Traditional approaches, such as manual observations, surveys, and simple simulations, often struggle to capture the complexity and nuance of real-world human behavior and experience. Here we introduce TravelAgent, a novel agentic simulation platform that models pedestrian navigation, activity, and human-like decision-making in the built environment. TravelAgent is proposed to help design teams and decision-makers understand how different users might experience diverse built environments under varying environmental conditions. TravelAgent integrates Generative Agents, multi-modal sensory inputs, and virtual environments, enabling agents to perceive, navigate, and interact with their surroundings, with tasks ranging from goal-oriented navigation to free exploration. We share analysis from 200 simulations with 3364 decision points and task completion rate of ∼80%, across diverse spatial layouts and agent archetypes. We present spatial, linguistic, and sentiment analysis, and show how agents react and experience their surroundings. Finally, we suggest TravelAgent as a new paradigm for designing, simulating, and understanding human experiences in urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariel Noyman & Kai Hu & Kent Larson, 2026. "TravelAgent: Generative agents in the built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 53(2), pages 377-397, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:377-397
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083251360458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251360458
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083251360458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amir-Homayoun Javadi & Beatrix Emo & Lorelei R. Howard & Fiona E. Zisch & Yichao Yu & Rebecca Knight & Joao Pinelo Silva & Hugo J. Spiers, 2017. "Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, April.
    2. S. Hassan Ameli & Shima Hamidi & Andrea Garfinkel-Castro & Reid Ewing, 2015. "Do Better Urban Design Qualities Lead to More Walking in Salt Lake City, Utah?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 393-410, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singleton, Patrick A. & Park, Keunhyun & Lee, Doo Hong, 2021. "Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Lingzhu Zhang & Yu Ye & Wenxin Zeng & Alain Chiaradia, 2019. "A Systematic Measurement of Street Quality through Multi-Sourced Urban Data: A Human-Oriented Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Ali Soltani, 2022. "Which Fabric/Scale Is Better for Transit-Oriented Urban Design: Case Studies in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Dwayne Marshall Baker, 2024. "Burden or benefit: Is retail marijuana facility siting influenced by LULU- or gentrification-related neighbourhood characteristics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1049-1070, May.
    7. Susanne Ulrich & Eva Grill & Virginia L Flanagin, 2019. "Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Jae Min Lee, 2021. "Understanding volume and correlations of automated walk count: Predictors for necessary, optional, and social activities in Dilworth Park," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 331-347, February.
    9. Marta Kryven & Suhyoun Yu & Max Kleiman-Weiner & Tomer Ullman & Joshua Tenenbaum, 2024. "Approximate planning in spatial search," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Haiming Wang, 2023. "Walk Score, Environmental Quality and Walking in a Campus Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Zhang, Zhehao & Wang, Haiming & Fisher, Thomas, 2024. "The development, validation, and application of the campus walk score measurement system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 40-54.
    12. Shima Hamidi & Somayeh Moazzeni, 2019. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Peter H. Bloch & Omid Kamran-Disfani, 2018. "A framework for studying the impact of outdoor atmospherics in retailing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 195-213, December.
    14. Benhamou, Salima, 2022. "Les transformations du travail et de l’emploi à l’ère de l’Intelligence artificielle: Évaluation, illustrations et interrogations," Documentos de Proyectos 48529, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Michael W. Mehaffy & Nikos A. Salingaros & Alexandros A. Lavdas, 2023. "The “Modern” Campus: Case Study in (Un)Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, November.
    16. Hessameddin Maniei & Reza Askarizad & Maryam Pourzakarya & Dietwald Gruehn, 2024. "The Influence of Urban Design Performance on Walkability in Cultural Heritage Sites of Isfahan, Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, September.
    17. Heidi Silvennoinen & Saskia Kuliga & Pieter Herthogs & Daniela Rodrigues Recchia & Bige Tunçer, 2022. "Effects of Gehl’s urban design guidelines on walkability: A virtual reality experiment in Singaporean public housing estates," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(9), pages 2409-2428, November.
    18. Zhehao Zhang & Haiming Wang & Lei Pang & Thomas Fisher & Shuo Yang, 2023. "Comparisons of Built Environment Correlates of Walking in Urban and Suburban Campuses: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Jack Coffin & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2021. "The Möbius strip of market spatiality: mobilizing transdisciplinary dialogues between CCT and the marketing mainstream," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 40-59, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:377-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.