IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v53y2026i2p319-335.html

Perceived distance to greenery affects psychological restoration

Author

Listed:
  • Haoran Ma
  • Yan Zhang
  • Qinyu Cui
  • Mei-Po Kwan
  • Jiannan Cai

Abstract

The benefits of interacting with greenery are numerous, yet the extent to which perceived distance to greenery influences positive psychological reactions has been overlooked in past studies. In this study, we propose a framework for investigating the impact of perceived distance to greenery on psychological restoration utilizing street view images (SVIs), machine learning, Causal Forest, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). We initially scored 1003 SVIs using the Perceived Restorativeness Scale-11 (PRS-11) to create a dataset for ML. Subsequently, we employed an enhanced Dense Prediction Transformer (DPT) model to estimate the human-perceived greenery distance. The processed data were then used to train and evaluate five machine learning models. The model that performed best was used to conduct a Causal Forest and a SHAP analysis to infer the causal and non-linear relationship between greenery distance and psychological restoration. The results show that (1) the DPT model precisely captures the human-perceived greenery distance, showing strong concordance with physical measurements with overall accuracy >75%; (2) there is a significant positive causal relationship between perceived greenery distance and psychological restoration, with an average treatment effect (ATE) of 0.102 (p

Suggested Citation

  • Haoran Ma & Yan Zhang & Qinyu Cui & Mei-Po Kwan & Jiannan Cai, 2026. "Perceived distance to greenery affects psychological restoration," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 53(2), pages 319-335, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:319-335
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083251362610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251362610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083251362610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:319-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.