IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i8p1832-1851.html

Quantifying the benefits of urban amenities in Singapore with consideration of the effects of spatial heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Song
  • Jeremy Oon
  • Rakhi Manohar Mepparambath
  • Diem Trinh Thi Le
  • Hoai Nguyen Huynh

Abstract

Studying urban amenities is crucial for understanding their impact on quality of life, social equity, and sustainable city development. However, the valuation of urban amenities on a holistic level is understudied. This paper builds upon the framework of isobenefit lines, where residents supposedly receive the same level of combined benefits from all urban amenities. Specifically, our proposed approach takes into account the spatial heterogeneity of amenities and the proxy data of property transaction prices in Singapore to estimate their underlying monetary values. These monetary values were quantified using geographically weighted regression (GWR) that can adequately address spatial autocorrelation issues. Our results show that GWR outperforms the global linear regression model by approximately 150% increase in the R-square value, demonstrating a much better goodness of fit when dealing with spatial data sets. Additionally, the signs of the average coefficients of GWR are largely consistent with those of the global model, while the signs and magnitude of the GWR coefficients vary spatially. The spatial variations of modeling performance tend to intensify from older to younger towns. The results reveal that the central regions of Singapore are among the top spots that receive the highest levels of composite benefits. It is also observed that a spatial structure with multiple centers with high benefit scores emerges in the younger towns located in the peripheral rings of the city. This observation demonstrates the efforts of local authorities to promote a city with several regional centers of diverse functions. As the first study that applies the concept of isobenefit lines in a real urban setting, we demonstrate that the developed framework can be a useful addition to the existing toolbox of urban and infrastructure planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Song & Jeremy Oon & Rakhi Manohar Mepparambath & Diem Trinh Thi Le & Hoai Nguyen Huynh, 2025. "Quantifying the benefits of urban amenities in Singapore with consideration of the effects of spatial heterogeneity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(8), pages 1832-1851, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:8:p:1832-1851
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241312953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241312953
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241312953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Palma, Andre & Picard, Nathalie & Waddell, Paul, 2007. "Discrete choice models with capacity constraints: An empirical analysis of the housing market of the greater Paris region," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 204-230, September.
    2. Francois Des Rosiers & Antonio Lagana & Marius Theriault, 2001. "Size and proximity effects of primary schools on surrounding house values," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 149-168, January.
    3. Owusu-Edusei, Kwame & Espey, Molly & Lin, Huiyan, 2007. "Does Close Count? School Proximity, School Quality, and Residential Property Values," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 211-221, April.
    4. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    5. Tris Kee & Kwong Wing Chau, 2020. "Adaptive reuse of heritage architecture and its external effects on sustainable built environment—Hedonic pricing model and case studies in Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1597-1608, November.
    6. Hou, Yuting & Yap, Winston & Chua, Rochelle & Song, Siqi & Yuen, Belinda, 2020. "The associations between older adults’ daily travel pattern and objective and perceived built environment: A study of three neighbourhoods in Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 314-328.
    7. Gao, Fan & Yang, Linchuan & Han, Chunyang & Tang, Jinjun & Li, Zhitao, 2022. "A network-distance-based geographically weighted regression model to examine spatiotemporal effects of station-level built environments on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Kai Cao & Mi Diao & Bo Wu, 2019. "A Big Data–Based Geographically Weighted Regression Model for Public Housing Prices: A Case Study in Singapore," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(1), pages 173-186, January.
    9. Patrick Schirmer & Michael van Eggermond & Kay Axhausen, 2014. "The role of location in residential location choice models: a review of literature," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(2), pages 3-21.
    10. Wang, Chih-Hao & Chen, Na, 2017. "A geographically weighted regression approach to investigating the spatially varied built-environment effects on community opportunity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 136-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nana Cui & Hengyu Gu & Tiyan Shen & Changchun Feng, 2018. "The Impact of Micro-Level Influencing Factors on Home Value: A Housing Price-Rent Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Cankun Wei & Meichen Fu & Li Wang & Hanbing Yang & Feng Tang & Yuqing Xiong, 2022. "The Research Development of Hedonic Price Model-Based Real Estate Appraisal in the Era of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Pierre Levasseur & Katrin Erdlenbruch & Christelle Gramaglia, 2019. "Why do people continue to live near polluted sites? Empirical evidence from Southwestern Europe," CEE-M Working Papers hal-02277633, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    4. Cyprian Chwiałkowski & Adam Zydroń & Dariusz Kayzer, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Selected Attributes on Dwelling Prices Using Ordinary Least Squares Regression and Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Poznań, Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Biel E. Metz, 2015. "Effect of Distance to Schooling on Home Prices," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 45(2), pages 151-171, Fall.
    6. Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Shearer, Heather, 2023. "The value of green infrastructure to property prices: Evidence from the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li & Huayi Yu, 2020. "Mass Appraisal Modeling of Real Estate in Urban Centers by Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression: A Case Study of Beijing’s Core Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Payel Roy & Karthik K. Srinivasan, 2025. "Geographically Weighted Nonlinear Regression for Cost-Effective Policies to Enhance Bus Ridership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-35, March.
    9. Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A. & Ellison, Richard, 2017. "Endogenous treatment of residential location choices in transport and land use models: Introducing the MetroScan framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 120-131.
    10. Cao, Xiang & Luo, Yuying & Chen, Xiaolan & Xie, Qiuyue & Yao, Zhenyu, 2024. "Spatial valuation of urban green lungs: Unveiling the true worth of urban parks through MGWR in Chengdu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Yang Wang & Kangmin Wu & Jing Qin & Changjian Wang & Hong’ou Zhang, 2020. "Examining Spatial Heterogeneity Effects of Landscape and Environment on the Residential Location Choice of the Highly Educated Population in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Bełej, Mirosław & Cellmer, Radosław & Foryś, Iwona & Głuszak, Michał, 2023. "Airports in the urban landscape: externalities, stigmatization and housing market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Cynthia Chen & Jason Chen & Harry Timmermans, 2009. "Historical Deposition Influence in Residential Location Decisions: A Distance-Based GEV Model for Spatial Correlation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2760-2777, November.
    14. Yi Huang & Sandy Dall’erba, 2021. "Does Proximity to School Still Matter Once Access to Your Preferred School Zone Has Already Been Secured?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 548-577, May.
    15. Zhao, Pengjun & Cao, Yushu, 2020. "Commuting inequity and its determinants in Shanghai: New findings from big-data analytics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 20-37.
    16. Ward, Clement E. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Dutton, Jennifer M., 2008. "Implicit Value of Retail Beef Product Attributes," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-18.
    17. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Letki, Natalia & Tryjanowski, Piotr & Wąs, Adam, 2021. "Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Onundur Pall Ragnarsson, 2025. "A Hedonic Housing Model for Macroprudential Policy," Economics wp99, Department of Economics, Central bank of Iceland.
    19. Hyowon Kim & Dong Soo Kim & Greg M. Allenby, 2020. "Benefit Formation and Enhancement," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-468, December.
    20. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:8:p:1832-1851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.