IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i7p1735-1755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the suitability of settlement delineations for monitoring infilling: A web- and GIS-based expert evaluation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Eichhorn
  • Oliver Harig
  • Stefan Siedentop
  • Robert Hecht

Abstract

21 st century urbanisation features not only the growth of city populations but also the emergence of densification (infilling) as significant trends in urban development. While urban sprawl has long been acknowledged for its adverse effects, understanding densification remains challenging due to inadequate empirical and statistical frameworks. This study investigates the suitability of different geospatial datasets and methods for delineating settlement areas and assessing infill housing, an aspect crucial for urban planning and development. Quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal notable variations in the classification of settlement areas and infilling across datasets. Quantitatively, the study shows distinct differences in the delineation of settlement areas, with the share of infilling varying significantly. Qualitatively, expert assessments highlight the strengths and weaknesses of datasets regarding their accuracy and consistency, revealing that the method to delineate settlement areas significantly impacts the balance between infilling and greenfield development. The study underscores the need for a nuanced approach to conceptualising densification measurement, particularly in defining urban boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Eichhorn & Oliver Harig & Stefan Siedentop & Robert Hecht, 2025. "Assessing the suitability of settlement delineations for monitoring infilling: A web- and GIS-based expert evaluation approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(7), pages 1735-1755, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1735-1755
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241308407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241308407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241308407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1735-1755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.