IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i7p1685-1700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting building height control indicators of landmark skylines: A visual perception experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Gao Yuan
  • Wei Yuyao
  • Yu Miao

Abstract

The landmark skyline contains a modern high-rise landmark taller than neighboring buildings. Landmark prominence and overall volatility are two essential environmental features connecting to skyline building height control, described in previous research by several indicators. A visual perception experiment is conducted in this study to assess these indicators. The experiment involves a correlation analysis between physical attributes calculated from sample images and relevant perceptions acquired by semantic differential questionnaires. The results reveal that A2 (landmark primacy by second tallest height) and A4 (landmark primacy by average height) are suitable indicators for describing the perception of landmark prominence, and B4 (average adjacent height difference) is a better indicator for the perception of overall volatility. Concerning relations, high landmark prominence and high overall volatility perceptions are incompatible. High overall volatility may suppress the perception of high landmark prominence. In addition, increasing the height of the landmark can effectively improve landmark prominence perception, while improving overall volatility perception requires regulating the heights of more buildings and conducting more precise height controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao Yuan & Wei Yuyao & Yu Miao, 2025. "Selecting building height control indicators of landmark skylines: A visual perception experiment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(7), pages 1685-1700, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1685-1700
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241304250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241304250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241304250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1685-1700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.