IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i7p1650-1668.html

The importance of the social environment on leisure destination choice: A mixed multinomial analysis of homophilic preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Gramsch-Calvo
  • Kay W Axhausen

Abstract

Individuals are fond of belonging to a social environment with a similar social background, which can impact the individual’s decision to visit specific venues for leisure activities. Using data from Zurich, we have measured the preference for a social environment in four categories of leisure venues: restaurants, cafes, bars, and nightclubs; the estimation was performed using a mixed multinomial logit model to see how homophily for socioeconomic characteristics can impact the decisions of choosing a leisure venue. The models included three homophilic preferences: age, income, and cultural origin as variables of interest. The results show a positive impact of the three variables in different degrees: age is the most relevant in the two venue categories, income only impacts when individuals choose restaurants or cafes, and cultural background is more relevant for nightlife venues. These results show that the sociodemographic characteristics of the social environment are relevant for the choice of leisure destinations. These findings can contribute to the formulation of policies to create more diverse leisure environments and socially cohesive communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Gramsch-Calvo & Kay W Axhausen, 2025. "The importance of the social environment on leisure destination choice: A mixed multinomial analysis of homophilic preferences," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(7), pages 1650-1668, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1650-1668
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241303198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241303198
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241303198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinhee Kim & Soora Rasouli & Harry J. P. Timmermans, 2018. "Social networks, social influence and activity-travel behaviour: a review of models and empirical evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 499-523, July.
    2. Nicolo P Pinchak & Christopher R Browning & Catherine A Calder & Bethany Boettner, 2021. "Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2758-2781, October.
    3. Erez Hatna & Itzhak Benenson, 2015. "Combining Segregation and Integration: Schelling Model Dynamics for Heterogeneous Population," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15.
    4. Mert Kimya, 2018. "Choice, Consideration Sets, and Attribute Filters," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 223-247, November.
    5. Gramsch-Calvo, Benjamin & Axhausen, Kay W., 2024. "Exploring the influence of social relations and knowledge of the urban environment on leisure travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Han, Chenglin & Luo, Lichen & Parady, Giancarlos & Takami, Kiyoshi & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Harata, Noboru, 2023. "Modeling joint eating-out destination choices incorporating group-level impedance: A case study of the Greater Tokyo Area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Steven Goodreau & James Kitts & Martina Morris, 2009. "Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 103-125, February.
    8. Block, Per & Grund, Thomas, 2014. "Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 189-212, August.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0126093 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sergio Currarini & Matthew O. Jackson & Paolo Pin, 2009. "An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1003-1045, July.
    11. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Hui Wang & Mei-Po Kwan & Mingxing Hu & Junheng Qi & Jiemin Zheng & Bin Han, 2022. "Time Allocation and the Activity-Space-Based Segregation of Different Income Groups: A Case Study of Nanjing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gramsch-Calvo, Benjamin & Okamura, Koki & Takami, Kiyoshi & Oyama, Yuki & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Axhausen, Kay W. & Parady, Giancarlos, 2025. "Going the extra mile: Estimating the willingness to travel to meet with friends using a joint destination choice model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Nicola Campigotto & Chiara Rapallini & Aldo Rustichini, 2022. "School friendship networks, homophily and multiculturalism: evidence from European countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 1687-1722, October.
    3. Alm, James & Chen, Yuan & Lai, Weizheng & Li, Xun & Yuan, Peiwen, 2025. "Birds of a feather flock together? Gender differences in decision-making homophily of friendships," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Per Block & Marion Hoffman & Isabel J. Raabe & Jennifer Beam Dowd & Charles Rahal & Ridhi Kashyap & Melinda C. Mills, 2020. "Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 588-596, June.
    5. Abbas K. Rizi & Riccardo Michielan & Clara Stegehuis & Mikko Kivelä, 2025. "Homophily within and across groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Martin, Darius D. & Wright, Adam C. & Krieg, John M., 2020. "Social networks and college performance: Evidence from dining data," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Irene Crimaldi & Michela Del Vicario & Greg Morrison & Walter Quattrociocchi & Massimo Riccaboni, 2015. "Homophily and Triadic Closure in Evolving Social Networks," Working Papers 3/2015, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised May 2015.
    8. Paul A. Gompers & Kevin Huang & Sophie Q. Wang, 2017. "Homophily in Entrepreneurial Team Formation," Harvard Business School Working Papers 17-104, Harvard Business School.
    9. Rapallini, Chiara & Rustichini, Aldo, 2016. "Elective affinities matter as much as ethnicity in multi-ethnic schools," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PA), pages 243-262.
    10. Leung, Michael P., 2019. "A weak law for moments of pairwise stable networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 310-326.
    11. Michele Bernasconi & Matteo Galizzi, 2010. "Network formation in repeated interactions: experimental evidence on dynamic behaviour," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 9(2), pages 193-228, December.
    12. Sofia Dokuka & Diliara Valeeva & Maria Yudkevich, 2015. "Co-Evolution of Social Networks and Student Performance," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 44-65.
    13. Duxbury, Scott W, 2018. "Diagnosing Multicollinearity in Exponential Random Graph Models," SocArXiv 2tgm7, Center for Open Science.
    14. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Péter Czine & Péter Balogh & Zsanett Blága & Zoltán Szabó & Réka Szekeres & Stephane Hess & Béla Juhász, 2024. "Is It Sufficient to Select the Optimal Class Number Based Only on Information Criteria in Fixed- and Random-Parameter Latent Class Discrete Choice Modeling Approaches?," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Anthony Edo & Nicolas Jacquemet & Constantine Yannelis, 2019. "Language skills and homophilous hiring discrimination: Evidence from gender and racially differentiated applications," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 349-376, March.
    17. Jonas Hedlund & Carlos Oyarzun, 2018. "Imitation in heterogeneous populations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(4), pages 937-973, June.
    18. Geeraert, Joke & Rocha, Luis E.C. & Vandeviver, Christophe, 2024. "The impact of violent behavior on co-offender selection: Evidence of behavioral homophily," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Manuel Bagues & Natalia Zinovyeva, 2025. "Gender Segregation in Childhood Friendships and the Gender-Equality Paradox," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2538, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    20. repec:osf:socarx:rd6kw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Dev, Pritha, 2014. "Identity and fragmentation in networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-100.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:7:p:1650-1668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.