IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i6p1444-1463.html

Data requirements for a systematic analysis of urban food flows and their sustainability outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Guibrunet
  • Paul Hoekman
  • Andrea Bortolotti
  • Jane Battersby

Abstract

This paper systematically assesses the quantity and quality of existing secondary data on urban food flows, as well as its potential use to analyse the impacts of such flows on human health and environmental sustainability. To do so, the authors built a digital, open-access platform to systematise, store and visualise urban food flows data. Given the importance of systematically understanding diverse urban food systems, the objective of the platform is to ease the analysis and comparison of food flows across cities, and to provide a panorama of the quality of datasets and data gaps. By developing an accessible methodology that allows for effortless generation of data visualisations, additional urban food datasets can be included in the platform in order to enhance our common understanding of contemporary urban food metabolisms. The paper presents data on key nodes of urban food systems: production, imports, exports, processing, wholesale, retail, consumption, and food loss and waste. The platform also estimates the environmental impacts of each city’s diet and how much such a diet differs from a sustainable and healthy diet. To illustrate how the platform works, we present a preliminary analysis of four cities: Cape Town (South Africa), London (United Kingdom), Mexico City (Mexico) and Milan (Italy). We systematise and analyse pertinent secondary data for each city, and assess data quality and data gaps. We conclude with a reflection on the strengths and limitations of the online platform, and with an open invitation to use the platform to analyse other cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Guibrunet & Paul Hoekman & Andrea Bortolotti & Jane Battersby, 2025. "Data requirements for a systematic analysis of urban food flows and their sustainability outcomes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(6), pages 1444-1463, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:6:p:1444-1463
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241298431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241298431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241298431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Hoekman & Harro Blottnitz, 2017. "Cape Town’s Metabolism: Insights from a Material Flow Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(5), pages 1237-1249, October.
    2. Saha, Mithun & Eckelman, Matthew J., 2015. "Geospatial assessment of potential bioenergy crop production on urban marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 540-547.
    3. Benjamin Goldstein & Morten Birkved & John Fernández & Michael Hauschild, 2017. "Surveying the Environmental Footprint of Urban Food Consumption," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(1), pages 151-165, February.
    4. Forkes, Jennifer, 2007. "Nitrogen balance for the urban food metabolism of Toronto, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 74-94.
    5. Ai, Ning & Zheng, Junjun, 2019. "Community-Based Food Waste Modeling and Planning Framework for Urban Regions," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 9(1).
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Brown, Marilyn A., 2010. "Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4856-4869, September.
    7. Facchini, Angelo & Kennedy, Chris & Stewart, Iain & Mele, Renata, 2017. "The energy metabolism of megacities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 86-95.
    8. Jane Battersby, 2011. "Urban food insecurity in Cape Town, South Africa: An alternative approach to food access," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 545-561, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louise Guibrunet & Araceli Sánchez Jiménez, 2023. "The current and potential role of urban metabolism studies to analyze the role of food in urban sustainability," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 196-209, February.
    2. Feyisayo A Odunitan-Wayas & Mieke Faber & Amy E Mendham & Julia H Goedecke & Lisa K Micklesfield & Naomi E Brooks & Dirk L Christensen & Iain J Gallagher & Kathryn H Myburgh & Angus M Hunter & Estelle, 2021. "Food Security, Dietary Intake, and Foodways of Urban Low-Income Older South African Women: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Jingyi Liu & Feng Gui & Qian Zhou & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2023. "Carbon Footprint of a Large Yellow Croaker Mariculture Models Based on Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Di, Yuhang, 2024. "Spatial connection strength and endogenous and exogenous interactive driving factors of carbon efficiency in China's metropolitan areas with higher energy consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Alessio Muscillo & Simona Re & Sergio Gambacorta & Giuseppe Ferrara & Nicola Tagliafierro & Emiliano Borello & Alessandro Rubino & Angelo Facchini, 2021. "Circular City Index: An Open Data analysis to assess the urban circularity preparedness of cities to address the green transition -- A study on the Italian municipalities," Papers 2109.10832, arXiv.org.
    7. John A. Paravantis & Panagiotis D. Tasios & Vasileios Dourmas & Georgios Andreakos & Konstantinos Velaoras & Nikoletta Kontoulis & Panagiota Mihalakakou, 2021. "A Regression Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Jukka Heinonen & Antti-Juhani Säynäjoki & Matti Kuronen & Seppo Junnila, 2012. "Are the Greenhouse Gas Implications of New Residential Developments Understood Wrongly?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Davis, Jac & Magadzire, Nyasha & Hemerijckx, Lisa-Marie & Maes, Tijs & Durno, Darryn & Kenyana, Nobelusi & Lwasa, Shuaib & Van Rompaey, Anton & Verburg, Peter H. & May, Julian, 2022. "Precision approaches to food insecurity: A spatial analysis of urban hunger and its contextual correlates in an African city," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Liu, Zhu & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Liang, Sai & Anadon, Laura Diaz & Zhang, Chao & Guan, Dabo, 2015. "Four system boundaries for carbon accounts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 118-125.
    11. Fouad Khan & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Testing the efficacy of voluntary urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 141-154, November.
    12. Ram, Manish & Gulagi, Ashish & Aghahosseini, Arman & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2022. "Energy transition in megacities towards 100% renewable energy: A case for Delhi," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 578-589.
    13. Peter Marcotullio & Andrea Sarzynski & Jochen Albrecht & Niels Schulz & Jake Garcia, 2013. "The geography of global urban greenhouse gas emissions: an exploratory analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 621-634, December.
    14. Rolf, Werner & Diehl, Katharina & Zasada, Ingo & Wiggering, Hubert, 2020. "Integrating farmland in urban green infrastructure planning. An evidence synthesis for informed policymaking," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Wang, Qiang & Zhou, Kan, 2017. "A framework for evaluating global national energy security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 19-31.
    16. Yves Bettignies & Joao Meirelles & Gabriela Fernandez & Franziska Meinherz & Paul Hoekman & Philippe Bouillard & Aristide Athanassiadis, 2019. "The Scale-Dependent Behaviour of Cities: A Cross-Cities Multiscale Driver Analysis of Urban Energy Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Riikka Kyrö & Jukka Heinonen & Antti Säynäjoki & Seppo Junnila, 2012. "Assessing the Potential of Climate Change Mitigation Actions in Three Different City Types in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(7), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Mohammadi, Neda & Taylor, John E., 2017. "Urban energy flux: Spatiotemporal fluctuations of building energy consumption and human mobility-driven prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 810-818.
    19. Yang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Dansha & Masron, Tajul Ariffin, 2024. "The impact of smart city construction on achieving peak carbon neutrality: Evidence from 31 provinces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Aguiléra, Anne & Voisin, Marion, 2014. "Urban form, commuting patterns and CO2 emissions: What differences between the municipality’s residents and its jobs?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 243-251.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:6:p:1444-1463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.